Search for: "Ex Parte Vs" Results 461 - 480 of 656
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jan 2011, 6:40 am by Gritsforbreakfast
The Dallas DA isn't yet calling this an "exoneration," but it's certainly a wrongful conviction.Law vs. [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 8:25 pm by Kelly
Dickinson Wright and John Artz (Patently-O) (PharmaPatents) BPAI: Removing terminal disclaimers by patent reissue: Ex parte Shunpei Yamazaki (Patents Post Grant Blog) District Court N D Ohio: Equitable intervening rights: Bendix Commercial Vehicle Systems LLC, et al v. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 11:20 am by Eric
This deliberately set up an unnecessarily divisive “us-vs. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 3:20 am by Kelly
(Chicago IP Litigation Blog) BPAI: Sigram Schindler appeal in patent reexamination fails: Ex parte Teles AG Informationstechnologien (Patents Post Grant Blog) ITC: Public version of initial determination of no s 337 violation in Certain Silicon Microphone Packages (337-TA-695) (ITC Law Blog) US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Gaumard Scientific – Gaumard files new 337 complaint regarding Certain Birthing Simulators and Associated Systems (ITC Law Blog) (ITC 337… [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 2:23 pm by Moderator
"This is the largest transaction ever authorized by Ex-Im Bank for a company in Panama," said Ex-Im Bank Chairman James A. [read post]
24 Dec 2010, 6:56 am by The Legal Blog
Under Rule 10 the petition for grant of special leave shall be put up for hearing ex-parte unless there be a caveat. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 6:30 am by Jeralyn
Whether the government may meet its burden of proof that it has a compelling interest in requiring the production of expressive materials and that the subpoenaed materials are substantially related to the grand jury investigation entirely through ex parte, in camera submissions? [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 5:01 am by Kelly
(Docket Report) District Court N D California: False advertisement through third parties may constitute false marking, but facts must be pled with particularity: United States of America, ex. rel., et. al. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 1:35 pm by Narine Bagdassarian
  The math is simple – a $105 or so to register and be safe vs. a $150,000 statutory fine for infringement.[16]  Judge for yourself  The sticking point for many who have been sued seems to be that Righthaven files the lawsuits without the common courtesy of (a) giving a warning or (b) requesting that the allegedly infringing material be removed or correctly used.[17] Is this being done to prevent alleged offenders from taking down the infringing posts before suit is… [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 11:12 am by The Legal Blog
Looking to the scheme of Order 39, CPC it is clear that ordinarily an order of injunction may not be granted ex parte. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 4:04 am by pete.black@gmail.com (Peter Black)
"Man Threatens to Re-Possess Ex-Girlfriend's Breasts" http://j.mp/gdGFa3 is the news part of foxnews on the rise? [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 11:59 am by Brian Hollar
(Ex Officio Travel Boxers and SmartWool black sock liners.) [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 2:16 am by Kelly
(Patently-O) Statutory bar prior art in the non-obviousness analysis (Patently-O) Patent prosecution rates (Patently-O) US Patents – Decisions CAFC ruling opens possibility of using new evidence in Section 145 patent appeal proceedings: Hyatt vs. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 5:52 pm by Gideon
You realize that it’s a sham for the most part and that sometimes, they’re just out to get you no matter what. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 4:18 am by Kelly
Natural Organics, Inc (Chicago IP Litigation Blog) BPAI reverses an examiner’s rejection of a razor head for shaving invention as anticipated over pizza cutter art: Ex parte James Richard Colthurst (Anticipate This!) [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 5:46 pm by Law Lady
Sebelius, 13 No. 9 Westlaw Journal Nursing Home 7, Westlaw Journal Nursing Home October 22, 2010An industry group representing physician-owned hospitals has asked a federal judge to allow it to proceed with a lawsuit seeking to block part of the new health care reform law that limits the growth and construction of new doctor- owned facilities. [read post]