Search for: "FRENCH v. CALIFORNIA" Results 461 - 480 of 577
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Dec 2007, 1:00 am
,SwitzerlandSwitzerland to introduce regulation for patent attorneys: (BLOG@IP::JUR)United Kingdom2007 Annual IP Crime Report released by UK-IPO: (BLOG@IP::JUR), (IAM)Patents Act 2004 (Commencement No. 4 and Transitional Provisions) Order 2007 has been published in order to put in place the final batch of changes to the UK Patents Act 1977 made by the Patents Act 2004: (IPKat)United StatesUnited States Supreme Court to clarify patent exhaustion doctrine in Quanta… [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am by Ben
More from Europe: In Case C-355/12 Nintendo v PC Box the CJEU said that circumventing a protection system may not be unlawful. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am by Ben
And the French civil Supreme Court, the Cour de Cassation, held that a corporation cannot be the author of a work protected by copyright: “une personne morale ne peut avoir la qualité d’auteur. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 3:40 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: ECJ rules trade mark holders cannot stop honest comparative advertising: O2 Holdings Limited and O2 (UK) Limited v Hutchinson 3G UK Limited: (Out-Law), (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
24 May 2012, 5:27 pm by Andis Kaulins
FRANCE Anggun is French-naturalised singer-songwriter of Indonesian descent -- the first singer from Indonesia to break into American and European record charts. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 10:01 pm by Ken
In Aggravation: V. snarky assholes. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 3:10 pm by Rick Hills
Again, one need not accept such claims: The evidence linking Serrano v. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 4:32 pm by INFORRM
Whether the answer is legal aid or what they do in California, which is to provide a service where there is a lawyer at the court who can speak to both parties, I do not know, but every[one?] [read post]
15 Nov 2022, 8:47 am by Jennifer González
Accessed November 1, 2022. https://digitalcollections.nypl.org/items/6b0efb70-cdbb-9c8e-e040-e00a18065a96 In the 1854 case, O’Reilly et al. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 10:04 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Court reconsidering baseless ‘making available’ theory in file-sharing case Capitol Records v Jammie Thomas; amicus briefs from, MPAA, PFF: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Electronic Fontier Foundation), (Techdirt), (Ars Technica), (Patry Copyright Blog), (Patry Copyright Blog) ICANN approves rules allowing brands to be… [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 9:00 am
: (Spicy IP),USD 20 billion going off-patent: (Patent Circle),Canadian Prices Review Board asserts jurisdiction over products sold in US, but imported into Canada under Special Access Program: (Gowlings),Canadian Court of Appeal affirms decision allowing patent-owner to be joined to proceedings: Cobalt v Pfizer and Pharmascience v Pfizer: (Gowlings),PharmaStem appeals stem cell patent: asks for greater deference to patent examiners:… [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 4:01 pm by Daithí
Unfortunately, this unveiling has less resembled a technological revolution than a French farce. [read post]
24 Oct 2009, 1:52 pm by Daithí
Unfortunately, this unveiling has less resembled a technological revolution than a French farce. [read post]