Search for: "FRENCH v. CALIFORNIA"
Results 461 - 480
of 577
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2010, 5:00 am
Dastar Corp. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 10:05 am
California (09-604). [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 3:06 am
Dear ColleaguesI hope you find useful to have the links to the new issue of OPINIO JURIS in COMPARATIONE. once again we look forward to host contribution from our Juris Diversitatis group.If you have problems to read the post, please let me know.With my bestsciaoGiovanni #ssrnholder { font-face: Verdana, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 10px; } #ssrnholder #outline{ border-style: solid; border-width: 1px; border-color: #003366; max-width: 700px; } #ssrnholder table{ max-width: 700px;} #ssrnholder… [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 3:10 pm
Again, one need not accept such claims: The evidence linking Serrano v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 1:21 am
The case before the seven-judge panel asked whether Henry V should be held criminally responsible for the mass execution of French prisoners of war after the Battle of Agincourt in 1415. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 9:42 am
In May 1954, Brown v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 2:27 pm
Vuitton’s continued triumph in the French courts will not come as a surprise. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 12:10 pm
Wolf v. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 4:02 am
(TTABlog) US Trade Marks – Decisions District Court E D California: Court finds logo either protected as parody or not likely to cause confusion: Protectmarriage.com - Yes on 8 v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 3:04 am
Sylviane Diouf relates in her book, Servants of Allah: African Muslims enslaved in the Americas, that French missionaries record a special stubbornness by African Muslims in adopting the Catholic faith. [read post]
30 Jan 2010, 5:56 pm
Stewart v. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 5:31 am
– Public reveal and protecting IP rights (Patent Arcade) (IPblog) US Patents – Decisions District Court E D Texas: Marshall jury finds for defendant Google - no infringement and patents invalid: Function Media v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 3:51 am
(IP tango) ECJ sets aside partial refusal to grant CTM for ‘Vorsprung durch Technik’ (progress through technology): Audi AG v OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) (The IP Factor) ECJ: Davidoff criteria for exhaustion apply also if goods were first marketed within the EEA: Makro Zelfbedieningsgroothandel CV and others v Diesel SpA (JIPLP) Time for a general grumble - General Court decisions missing images, no English version: G-Star Raw Denim kft v OHIM, ESGW Holdings Ltd;… [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 3:46 am
– The Prior Art interview with 3 jurors in i4i v Microsoft (Prior Art) (Innovationpartners) (EDTexweblog.com) US Patents – Decisions District Court S D California: Loss of market share and ‘sole provider’ status warrant permanent injunction even where defendant ceases production of the infringing product: eBay Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 4:37 am
(Docket Report) US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Nokia - Nokia files new 337 complaint against Apple regarding certain electronic devices, including mobile phones, portable music players and computers and adds an additional lawsuit (ITC 337 Law Blog) Nokia – In addition to ITC complaint, Noklia files additional patent infringement suit against Apple in District Court Delaware (Ars Technica) (IPblog) Prism Technologies - ITC institutes investigation regarding certain… [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
Miller (Lewis and Clark), Judith V. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 6:33 am
(The Product Naming Blog) US Trade Marks & Domain Names – Decisions District Court C D California: Federal registration owned by someone else no defense to cybersquatting: Monex Deposit Co. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2009, 1:34 pm
California v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 4:01 pm
Unfortunately, this unveiling has less resembled a technological revolution than a French farce. [read post]
27 Nov 2009, 11:40 am
Polanski the photos were being shot for the French version of Vogue. [read post]
