Search for: "FRYE v. STATE"
Results 461 - 480
of 508
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Oct 2008, 7:03 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) Preston James Frye v. [read post]
13 Sep 2008, 12:18 am
The court stated it properly could look outside the appellate record for the purpose of determining the propriety of evidence under the Frye standard. [read post]
20 Jul 2008, 2:00 pm
In State court we still use the Frye test(Frye v. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 1:00 pm
Frye v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 3:36 pm
(Frye, The Peculiar Story of United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 3:00 pm
At page 51, Justice Scalia, writing for the court, cited a law review article entitled, “The Peculiar Story of United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 1:06 am
let me offer special congratulations to Brian Frye, a young lawyer and 2005 graduate of NYU School of Law, whose article The Peculiar Story of United States v. [read post]
1 May 2008, 11:21 am
See Hamilton v. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 1:10 pm
State,272 Ga. 540 (1) (533 SE2d 60) (2000); State of Ga. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 1:45 pm
In State of Indiana v. [read post]
27 Jan 2008, 8:29 am
State v. [read post]
5 Jan 2008, 12:51 pm
State v. [read post]
29 Dec 2007, 8:27 am
State v. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 4:40 am
State, 873 N.E.2d 1083 (Ind. [read post]
26 Nov 2007, 7:07 am
Frye, 07-360). [read post]
22 Nov 2007, 2:21 pm
I recommend Brian Frye, The Peculiar Story of United States vs. [read post]
12 Nov 2007, 7:50 am
Cystic Fibrosis Chapter 6917 Arlington Road, Suite 308 Bethesda, MD 20814 Phone: (301) 657-8444; (877) 657-8444 (Toll Free) Fax: (301) 652-9571 E-mail: metro-dc@cff.org Web: http://www.cff.orgmetrodc.htm Developmental Disabilities State Developmental Disabilities Planning Council MD Developmental Disabilities Council 300 West Lexington Street, Box 10 Baltimore, MD 21201-2323 Phone: (410) 333-3688 (V/TTY); (800) 305-6441 (Toll Free in MD only) E-mail: info@md-council.org Web:… [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 8:00 am
Frye Issue: Whether the Court’s decision on political firings in Elrod v. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 12:58 pm
The recent Zandi v. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 9:12 am
Bryan Rose, following a Frye hearing, excluded the testimony of a forensic fingerprint examiner because the "ACE-V" methodology of latent fingerprint examination is more likely than not "a subjective, untested, unverifiable identification procedure that purports to be infallible. [read post]
