Search for: "Failing v. Failing"
Results 461 - 480
of 98,521
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2024, 2:37 pm
Issue summary is from ScotusBlog, which also links to papers: Delligatti v. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 11:37 am
Sovereign Network Homes v Ms Vanessa East, Claim Number H01W1247 (13 May 2024, Central London County Court). [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 8:57 am
In Perrong v. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 8:28 am
On May 6, 2024, the California Supreme Court issued a significant ruling in Naranjo v. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 8:00 am
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) filed suit (EEOC v. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 7:17 am
In Delligatti v. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
Rosenthal v. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
Moreover, under the circumstances presented, plaintiff has failed to meet her prima facie burden of discrimination based on her religion under the McDonnell Douglas test and the somewhat more flexible "mixed-motive" framework (see Melman v Montefiore Med. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
Moreover, under the circumstances presented, plaintiff has failed to meet her prima facie burden of discrimination based on her religion under the McDonnell Douglas test and the somewhat more flexible "mixed-motive" framework (see Melman v Montefiore Med. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 5:42 am
In USAA Casualty Insurance Co. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 5:19 am
Bustamante v. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 5:00 am
To that end, an employer may prove that an employee has failed to mitigate their damages by demonstrating: that the employee in question failed to take reasonable steps to seek comparable employment; and that had the employee taken the necessary steps, they would have secured comparable employment. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 5:00 am
To that end, an employer may prove that an employee has failed to mitigate their damages by demonstrating: that the employee in question failed to take reasonable steps to seek comparable employment; and that had the employee taken the necessary steps, they would have secured comparable employment. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 4:39 am
Smith v. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 4:31 am
As the plaintiff failed to allege a mutual promise or undertaking to share the burden of the losses of the alleged enterprises, he failed to state a cause of action based on a joint venture agreement with regard to the OBST, Royce, and Supramax vessels transactions (citations and quotations omitted). [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 4:00 am
In Rumsfeld v. [read post]
1 Jun 2024, 10:13 am
The Indian Supreme Court, too, has failed to use its power to mould the law despite regularly being confronted with disputes on this subject. [read post]
31 May 2024, 6:03 pm
From Steinbuch v. [read post]
31 May 2024, 2:08 pm
Supreme Court delivered a major victory for free speech and struck a blow against government censorship-by-proxy yesterday in NRA v. [read post]
31 May 2024, 11:58 am
They note that in Becerra v. [read post]