Search for: "Favors v. Stewart" Results 461 - 480 of 530
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Nov 2014, 5:28 am by SHG
He starts with a quote from the beloved Nino Scalia: Justice Scalia on the rule of lenity in U.S. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 11:38 am
Following up on his previous posts about the Caperton case (here and here), University of Tennessee Professor Alex Long passes along this assessment of the opinion:             As you may have heard, the Supreme Court's decision in Caperton v. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 7:43 am by Joy Waltemath
However, the court affirmed summary judgment on her discriminatory termination and retaliation claims, explaining that there was no evidence that the decisionmakers held discriminatory animus, and the termination decision had been made before she filed her EEOC charge (Stewart v. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 9:59 pm by Jeff Gamso
  And maybe he is.But it was John Roberts, no fan of my clients, who wrote this a couple of years ago in United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 4:50 am by SHG
The Times conceded that it, by policy, refuses to publish “hate speech,” a phrase that remains undefined and smacks of Justice Potter Stewart’s definition of pornography from his concurring opinion in Jacobellis v. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 7:21 am by Scott Bomboy
” The last Supreme Court recess appointments were during the Eisenhower era: Earl Warren, William Brennan, and Potter Stewart. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 3:17 pm by David Lat
— author of the colorful opinion in Gustafson v. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 3:01 pm
Stewart The battle over §2(b) of the latest restatement—which gives manufacturers a free pass from liability unless plaintiffs prove a reasonable alternative design—is far from over. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 3:29 am by Peter Mahler
The second factor also argues in favor of deadlock. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 3:29 am by Peter Mahler
The second factor also argues in favor of deadlock. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 3:31 pm by Joe Mullin
In March, New York federal district court judge Robert Sweet ruled in favor of the plaintiffs on summary judgment, saying Myriad's patents on the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes cover parts of the natural world and therefore don't conform to the nation's patent laws. [read post]
4 Mar 2023, 4:38 am by SHG
Martin did not want to come down in favor of one of these conclusions or the other. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 8:32 am by David Post
I admit that I'm no expert in the doctrine in this area, though I do watch it out of the corner of my eye, and I can't recall reading a more ridiculous standing decision in the last 10 years or so than the one the Court endorsed in the 303 Creative v. [read post]