Search for: "Fee v. State"
Results 461 - 480
of 18,916
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jul 2017, 8:57 am
She accepted the disposition ordered by the referee, but her attorney objected to the $100 probation supervision fee, citing People v Juntikka, 310 Mich App 306; 871 NW2d 555 (2015). [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 1:30 am
The Supreme Court in R (Tigere) v Secretary of State for Business Innovation and Skills [2015] UKSC 57 held by a 3:2 majority that the blanket requirement that all applicants for a student loan have “indefinite leave to remain” is discriminatory and must be amended by the Government. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 3:57 am
Accardi v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 3:50 am
Seeking payment for attorney fees encumbered by a state officer or employee in defending a criminal complaint involving the individual as a defendantPolice Benevolent Assoc. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 8:36 am
Ingram v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 10:06 pm
Abood v. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 1:00 pm
State of California, 138 Cal.App.4th 550 (2006) (Fourth Appellate District, Division Two). [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 4:36 am
In Stokes v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 12:11 am
The Supreme Court adopted a test in United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 4:10 pm
we touched briefly on the recently decided case of Grossman v. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 10:54 am
Hauenstein v. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 11:30 am
But last week, looking at the Order approving a class action settlement and a fee petition in Elliott v. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 10:20 am
See Neal-Pettit v. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 8:50 am
In Murphy v. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 12:03 pm
Mark v. [read post]
1 Jun 2019, 8:42 pm
Libby v. [read post]
26 May 2017, 6:41 am
Amusement Art, LLC v. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 5:27 pm
The state attorney general won the right to hire contingent fee counsel -- but lost the case on the merits. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 11:23 am
In the recent decision of Jay Frechter v. [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 8:10 am
Here’s a nice follow up ruling in the case of Curran v Camden National, a particularly interesting ERISA case that I discussed here. [read post]