Search for: "Felts v. State"
Results 461 - 480
of 5,741
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2018, 7:37 pm
That the primary thrust of N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4(c) is not to interdict speech, but rather conduct, is reinforced in State v. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 5:00 am
The court felt that the Third Circuit position would would discourage states from discretionary laws and the system would be harmed as a result. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 5:01 am
I blogged two weeks ago about Hansen v. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 12:18 pm
Matter of AJK CafE, Inc. v New York State Liquor Authority In this Article 78 proceeding, Petitioner appealed a determination of the New York State Liquor Authority finding him in violation of 9 NYCRR 48.3 due to employment of an unlicensed security guard. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
The felt need for constitutional theory to maintain connections with constitutional practice made possible the outsized influence of Justice Scalia. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 6:37 am
State v. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 5:57 pm
However, when convinced of former error, this Court has never felt constrained to follow precedent. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 3:29 pm
The deputy also felt Chadwick kicking the deputy several times in the leg. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 7:05 am
Case Background In the case before the Supreme Court, Kucana v. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 6:43 am
Big Dipper Entm't, L.L.C. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 4:05 am
In Griego v. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 12:07 am
Against this background, the judge felt that it would be very difficult to draw hard and fast boundaries between ‘zones’ – whether business or familial in nature. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 9:41 pm
United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 2:46 am
In United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 4:00 am
*Citing Crookendale v. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 4:00 am
*Citing Crookendale v. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 7:39 am
Martel Building Ltd. v Canada, [1997] 129 FTR 249 (FCTD), revd [1998] 163 DLR (4th) 504 (FCA), leave to appeal refused, 2000 SCC 60, [2000] 2 SCR 860, online: LexUM http://scc.lexum.org/en/2000/2000scc60/2000scc60.html Facts Note: This case deals with the possibility of a tort action in negligence for breach of a duty of care during negotiation of a contract (specifically during the solicitation and evaluation of tendered bids). [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 8:32 pm
" I, too, felt this way. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 4:11 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 2:02 pm
The typical upsides and downsides of living in California are well-known; for the former, awesome weather, great beaches, cool citizenry (for the most part), etc., and high housing costs and tax rates (inter alia) for the latter.But what I really felt strongly when I read today's opinion -- which is by no means an exceptional or unusual one, I might add -- was just how much I like living in a state that has a supreme court like ours. [read post]
