Search for: "Gaines v. Social Security Administration"
Results 461 - 480
of 503
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Sep 2010, 6:39 pm
In fact, the Child Support Guidelines includes, but is not limited to 23 possibilities for income, as follows: a. compensation for services, including wages, fees, tips, and commissions; b. the operation of a business minus ordinary and necessary operating expenses (see IRS Schedule C); c. gains derived from dealings in property; d. interest and dividends (see IRS Schedule B); e. rents (minus ordinary and necessary expenses - see IRS Schedule E); f. bonuses and royalties; g. alimony… [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 10:00 pm
Ten Reasons Why You Should Teach Here — And Three Why You Shouldn't (v. 4.0) 1. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 7:22 am
They boasted loud and often that Republicans were losing the country because of their unpopular decisions to go to war in Iraq, establish new national security protocols, lobby for Social Security reform, stress border security, etc. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 1:29 am
[Post by Venkat, with additional comments by Eric] Facebook v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 7:22 am
As one critical commentator puts it, "The fact that the Fed is charged with being the lender of last resort ultimately puts it in a position of socializing financial losses (while privatizing gains). [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 4:33 am
Two-part test applied in resolving union’s improper practice chargeMatter of Social Service Employees Union, Local 371, (Aubrey Norris) v New York City Bd. of Collective Bargaining, 47 AD3d 417The Appellate Division upheld a determination by the New York City Board of Collective Bargaining that denied Local 371’s claim that the New York City Administration for Children’s Services [ACS] committed an improper practice petition when it denied a union… [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 2:58 pm
" During these 24 months, Schexnayder was found by the Social Security Administration to be totally disabled from any occupation and was awarded Social Security disability benefits. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 7:33 pm
Today I am testifying at an FCC hearing on “Serving the Public Interest in the Digital Era. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 10:06 am
While there was testimony that there were files on the server that included social security numbers as well as personal medical information and other matters subject to state and federal confidentiality laws, that testimony was never tied to the specific files Young accessed. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 4:51 am
Some serious and common side effects include: allergic reactions, heart problems, liver and kidney failure, weight gain/loss, and psychological effects. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 9:11 am
Because many people use the same passwords for all sorts of different services, this can help them gain access to social network profiles. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 9:32 am
Verdict: wrong. (9) As a result of the jury's guilty verdict in U.S. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 4:03 pm
In Knowles v. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 12:52 pm
They both pled guilty to Count One, which, according to the defendants, only alleged fraud for the mailing of a check for $477.90 from the Social Security Administration. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 12:29 am
The ruling in Tafas v. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 6:07 am
Manchester v. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 12:32 pm
They are likely to pass a health care reform bill that gives a windfall to private insurance (mandatory premiums from all those who are relatively healthy and have chosen in the past not to be covered) while costing the federal government (coverage of the vulnerable, which will be picked up by government)--a repeat of the privatization of gains/socialization of losses that has been the norm for our handling of the financial crisis. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 1:41 am
The most desirable outcome in both schemes is for the parties to come to an agreement which reduces transaction, administrative, and social costs. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 6:30 am
This is the third in the four-part series from the brain injury case of Gregory Joseph Gagnon, et al. v. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 4:43 am
In the Doe v. [read post]
