Search for: "Gal v. Gal" Results 461 - 471 of 471
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Apr 2007, 2:33 am
Nous sommes cependant tout à fait conscients de notre obligation de concourir au travail de la police dans ses enquêtes, dès lors que le cadre légal est respecté. [read post]
17 Jan 2007, 6:54 am
It could, ruled the CFI, and could reach the conclusion that there was, in part, a likelihood of confusion even on the evidence before it.The IPKat notes how carefully the CFI phrased its reasoning, distinguishing its own earlier case law in Case T‑311/01 Éditions Albert René v OHIM - Trucco (Starix) [2003] ECR II‑4625 and Case T‑66/03 ‘Dire Mullen sinds 1818' v OHIM -… [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 11:10 am
As far as we know, the elfin Erwin Chemerinsky did not participate in the KSR v. [read post]
18 Nov 2006, 3:17 am
"Interesting that Universal's suit, as here quoted, does not mention the weasel word "inducement", as their attack must surely be based on MGM v Grokster and its new test for third party copyright infringement. [read post]