Search for: "German v. State"
Results 461 - 480
of 3,140
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Aug 2011, 6:51 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Faith Stewart v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2011] EWCA Civ 907 (29 July 2011) Suckrajh, R (on the application of) v The Asylum & Immigration Tribunal & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 938 (29 July 2011) Iqbal v Ahmed [2011] EWCA Civ 900 (29 July 2011) Hayes v Merseyside Police [2011] EWCA Civ 911 (29 July 2011) Austin & Ors v Miller Argent (South Wales) Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 928 (29 July 2011) Modi… [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 7:00 am
Supreme Court held in Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 5:03 pm
It marked the United States’ largest military campaign to date, involving 1.2 million soldiers of the American Expeditionary Force. [read post]
20 Sep 2020, 12:22 pm
In practical terms, it's another Nokia v. [read post]
3 Jan 2025, 8:25 am
An old German proverb states that “to change and to change for the better are two different things. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 4:53 am
Qualcomm antitrust trial will begin in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 9:21 am
French and German comparative law scholars have filed an amicus brief in Kiobel under the lead of Professor Vivian Grosswald Curran. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 5:35 am
German water v beer hereBad water hereBath water hereBad Kissinger hereBad kissing hereGerman water for the Court of Justice of the European Union here [read post]
23 May 2019, 12:40 am
ProtonMail further claims that it is exempt from the Swiss Federal Act on the Surveillance of Post and Telecommunications (SPTA, German: Bundesgesetz betreffend die Überwachung des Post- und Fernmeldeverkehrs, BÜPF) and the Ordinance on the Surveillance of Post and Telecommunications (SPTO, German: Verordnung über die Überwachung des Post- und Fernmeldeverkehrs, VÜPF). [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 8:02 am
Even if a convention passed non-germane amendments, Congress would not even be permitted to submit them to the states for ratification if they went beyond the topic in the initial petitions for a convention. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 3:12 pm
277/10, Martin Luksan v Petrus van der Let, a reference for a preliminary ruling from the Handelsgericht Wien (Austria), in which the legal issues were a good deal more complex than "who gets what? [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 9:01 am
You haven't heard his name before and no one in the United States has even cared enough to make a Wikipedia page for him in English, even though our museums are full of works that passed through his hands. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:00 am
Airflow Catalyst Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 12:49 am
OPPO/OPPO v. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 6:11 am
The Court also held that the Pittsburgh Terminal Corp. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 4:51 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 6:23 pm
The United States has done so much for Germany in the 20th century. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 5:00 am
Whether Gentry remains good law or not may be gleaned from this opinion but it doesn’t appear likely it will be clearly stated. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 6:31 am
Georg Werner) has meanwhile published (on a website run by the Bavarian state government) two Nokia v. [read post]
6 Sep 2015, 6:34 am
The message from both the English and the German courts was that resolution authorities must adhere strictly to the terms of the BRRD; otherwise, measures that they take in relation to distressed banks may not be given effect in other Member States. [read post]
