Search for: "Givens v. City of Chicago" Results 461 - 480 of 666
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Oct 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Charles Koch Has Given More Than $5 Billion of His Stock to Two MSN – Matt Durot (Forbes) | Published: 10/10/2023 Charles Koch is making big moves to ensure his charities and causes are funded long after he is gone. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 9:47 am by INFORRM
Zimbabwe Digital rights campaigners have raised concerns about plans to build a new ‘Cyber City’, nicknamed New Harare. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 5:25 am
  [16]  This makes cities like Miami or Houston a much more attractive cities to play, rather than playing in Los Angeles, New York City, whose 2008 tax rate was 6.85% for earnings over $40,000, [17], or Chicago whose 2008 state tax rate was 3%. [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 5:01 pm
Such parades have of course given legal scholars a great case to write about, being of course Hurley v Irish-American GLB Group of Boston. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 9:23 am by Sasha Volokh
And this facial approach is rooted in longstanding precedent: In Police Department of Chicago v. [read post]
24 Jun 2023, 4:50 pm by Russell Knight
City of Chicago, 771 NE 2d 1030 – Ill: Appellate Court, 1st Dist., 4th Div. 2002 “Illinois law is unequivocal: the exclusive test for the admission of expert testimony is governed by the standard first expressed in Frye v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 8:30 am by Eugene Volokh
A nice mix, if I do say so myself, especially given the argument we are making; thanks to all of them for joining, to UCLA law student Madison Way for her help with the brief, and, as always, to Scott & Cyan Banister, whose support makes our UCLA Amicus Brief Clinic possible. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 4:02 pm
They are not given copies of (i) the summons and complaint, (ii) the papers upon which the Court granted the ex parte discovery order, or (iii) the court rules needed to defend themselves, all of which are normally provided to defendants in federal lawsuits. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 6:41 pm by Stephen Halbrook
City of Chicago (2011) answered Judge Bibas's question well when it noted that "[t]he loss of a First Amendment right is frequently presumed to cause irreparable harm based on the intangible nature of the benefits flowing from the exercise of those rights. . . . [read post]