Search for: "Givens v. Clarke" Results 461 - 480 of 1,332
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2012, 1:15 pm by Bexis
  Most of the opinion addresses pretty much mundane disputes on heavily fact-bound questions:  (1) whether the risk was scientifically knowable as of the date of this plaintiff’s injury, and (2) whether the prescriber’s treatment would have changed had an “adequate” warning been given. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 5:16 am by Andy
Understandably District Judge Clarke reserved her judgment, but today this has been handed down. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
Regina v Budimir and another; Interfact Ltd v Liverpool City Council [2010] EWCA Crim 148; [2010] EWHC 1604 (Admin); [2010] WLR (D) 166 CA and DC: Lord Judge CJ, David Clarke, Lloyd Jones JJ: 29 June 2010 – read judgment A new High Court decision has struck a blow for legal certainty and enforced the sometimes forgotten right under human rights law against retrospective criminal sanctions, which applies even in cases where the UK had failed to enact European… [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 6:54 am
 In April 2016, permission was given for the claim to be expanded to cover the sale of gels as well. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 11:54 am by Eugene Volokh
Manne (formerly Lewis & Clark, now Executive Director of the International Center for Law and Economics) Elizabeth L. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 4:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
Cummins is the managing partner of the Clarks Summit, PA law firm of Cummins Law. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 9:59 pm by Matthew Hill
In respect of the period between the settlement date and the first periodical payment, a series of “safety net undertakings” were given by both sides in the litigation, and by DLI, the insurer of the injury claim defendant. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 11:39 am by Legal Beagle
‘I’ve got total faith in our case, but I’ve not been given much reason to date to have faith in our justice system. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
And, in Murphy v Callinan [2018] IESC 59 (30 November 2018) [36]-[44], Baker J (Clarke CJ and Dunne J concurring) in the Supreme Court approved Feeney J’s analysis in Collins (I will return to this case in a future post). [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 1:07 am by INFORRM
On 19 and 20 June 2023 Steyn J heard the harassment case of Clarke v Rose. [read post]