Search for: "Good v. State of California"
Results 461 - 480
of 8,129
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2016, 12:00 am
Download PDF of Williams v. [read post]
18 Aug 2021, 7:04 am
If you’re not familiar with the CPRA, this is a good one-stop resource to get you up to speed. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 2:42 pm
The California Supreme Court isn't like that. [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 12:59 pm
In Williams v. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 8:35 am
In the state of California, around 70 percent of the strawberry farmers are Hispanic. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 1:40 pm
(…) In 2016, the Attorney General filed an enforcement action against Ethicon on behalf of the People of the State of California. [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 8:36 am
Supreme Court decision in Bostock v. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 6:22 am
In response, some companies like VOX Media have laid off workers en masse – or blacklisting California writers to hire those in other states. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 12:25 am
Judge Illston's discussion is very good: "[T]o adequately plead scienter, the complaint must [] 'state with particularity factsgiving rise to a strong inference that the defendant acted with the required state of mind.'" ZuccoPartners LLC v. [read post]
13 May 2010, 10:17 pm
That finding by the trial court prompted the Court of Appeal to spend a good deal of time discussing the two different tests presented in the California Supreme Court cases of Discover Bank v. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 8:30 am
United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 2:22 pm
On July 30, 2020, the California Supreme Court gave good government a win when it upheld the state law that outlawed forms of pension “spiking. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 11:46 pm
Walker, Judge, United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
25 Aug 2019, 9:01 pm
Massachusetts and Zucht v. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 11:54 am
In Pitzer College v. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 1:19 pm
CLS Transportation Los Angeles, LLC, the California Supreme Court acknowledged that, under the United States Supreme Court’s decision in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 11:16 am
This case is good news for all employers, but especially those in California, where enforcing post-employment restrictions is a challenge. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 11:16 am
This case is good news for all employers, but especially those in California, where enforcing post-employment restrictions is a challenge. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 8:28 am
Three California state prisoners saw the denials of their respective § 2254 petitions at least partly reversed and remanded today, including one in a capital case.Bemore v. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 5:00 am
United States, 132 S. [read post]
