Search for: "Good v. State of California"
Results 461 - 480
of 7,480
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2015, 8:28 am
Three California state prisoners saw the denials of their respective § 2254 petitions at least partly reversed and remanded today, including one in a capital case.Bemore v. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 5:00 am
United States, 132 S. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
Supreme Court in 303 Creative v. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 11:16 am
This case is good news for all employers, but especially those in California, where enforcing post-employment restrictions is a challenge. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 11:16 am
This case is good news for all employers, but especially those in California, where enforcing post-employment restrictions is a challenge. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 4:57 am
A good case can be made that the FAST Act is preempted by the NLRA. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 5:00 am
In City of Richmond v. [read post]
18 Aug 2007, 9:03 am
More, Bush v. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 1:00 pm
Hill v. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 9:18 am
The clear rejection of Ramirez in California is good news. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 9:31 am
So, here, when it's (now) pretty clear that California courts would hold X, a Ninth Circuit panel applying state law can hold X even though prior circuit precedent has held Y.So far, so good. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 8:00 am
That was the question Justice Antonin Scalia posed during oral arguments today inAT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 10:43 am
The case is Howell v Hamilton Meats & Provisions. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 7:25 am
In People v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 3:43 pm
With that goal in mind, we note Coalition for Responsible Solar; California Unions for Reliable Energy; and Artie Mann v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 4:43 pm
As stated in Silacci v. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 12:36 pm
Case citation: The Ohio State University v. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 9:40 am
Good for them trying to make the world better.Yet, if it were me, I would not spend my time -- as David Boies and eight or so of his colleagues at Boies Schiller do here -- litigating a lawsuit that says that California should not be permitted to award all of its electoral votes (in a "winner take all" fashion) to whichever presidential candidate obtains the most votes in California in the 2020 election.Call me crazy, but I might be able to find other uses… [read post]
9 Jan 2025, 6:45 am
” (See Burrows v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 5:00 am
In People v. [read post]
