Search for: "Government's Response to Motion in Opposition" Results 461 - 480 of 1,368
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2018, 2:20 pm by Wolfgang Demino
(Nov. 16, 2017) Trust spat in Delaware Verbatim: CFPB's Opposition to Intervention of Interested Non-parties who want to block Consent Judgment between the Bureau and the National Collegiate Student Loan Trusts (Nov. 16, 2017) CFPB: The Toxic Vegetable in the Beltway Alphabet Soup (Oct 5, 2017) Transworld Systems Inc. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 4:17 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“[T]he issue of whether such additional responsibilities should be recognized and given legal effect is governed by the particular relationship between the parties and is best determined on a case-by-case basis” (Murphy v Kuhn, 90 NY2d 266, 272 [1997]). [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 6:00 am by John Mikhail
            For the Mid-Atlantic States, at least, the “dangerous clauses” were not dangerous at all, but precisely what they had long wanted in a new charter of government. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 7:11 am by Leah West
Bell reports that Kurdish forces want the Canadian government to take responsibility for its citizens in their custody. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 5:52 am by Richard Hunt
The work needed to make the defendant facility accessible was estimated to cost at least $110,000, take six months and involve problems with government permits. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 10:20 am by Erik Weibust and Erica Hendricks
In opposition to the motion, Fast Enterprises argued that the Court had subject matter jurisdiction over the case pursuant to the DTSA, which creates a federal cause of action for the misappropriation of trade secrets. [read post]
22 Sep 2018, 8:20 am by Brenna Gautam, Julia Solomon-Strauss
James Pohl as the presiding military judge, began discovery motions, and interviewed witness Lieutenant Doug Newman. [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 9:01 pm by Dean Falvy
You are not going to get credit for the good decisions and avoid blame for the bad ones—more likely the opposite. [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 12:32 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The rationale for the second motion was explained by the Opposition House Leader as follows, However, Bill 31 isn’t about the appropriate use of the “notwithstanding” clause. [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 6:03 am by Eugene Volokh
The federal government's investigation and the negative media reports continued for years, throughout the Board's consideration of Doe's case. [read post]
30 Aug 2018, 4:44 pm by Kevin LaCroix
I welcome guest post submissions from responsible authors on topics of interest to this blog’s readers. [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 3:58 pm by James Hastings
Patent and Trademark Office that is responsible for, among other things, trademark opposition and trademark cancellation disputes. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 5:00 am by Sarah Grant
Second, she denied the remaining defendants’ motion to dismiss the plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint and motion to dissolve the preliminary injunction. [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 9:34 am by Eric Goldman
Plaintiffs then filed a reply to the opposition to the motion for preliminary injunction (Dkt #17) on July 17th; the court held a motion hearing on July 19th, and plaintiffs filed a response to the motion to dismiss (Dkt #19) on July 26th. [read post]
12 Aug 2018, 8:44 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The government’s response to this suit was that the EIPA’s purpose was to allow them to regulate and control the export of certain goods and technology, but to do so in consideration of Canada’s economic and political interests. [read post]
10 Aug 2018, 3:51 pm by Dean Freeman
On public sidewalks, though, responsibility for maintenance usually rests with the county, city or town government. [read post]
5 Aug 2018, 8:00 am by Kathleen Claussen
Court of International Trade is reviewing a motion for summary judgment in that case. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 11:52 am by Victoria Clark
The settlement took many by surprise, and eight attorneys general filed a lawsuit and an emergency motion for a temporary restraining order in an attempt to block the settlement. [read post]