Search for: "Grant v. Walker" Results 461 - 480 of 1,236
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2015, 12:32 pm by Cardone Law Firm
Defendants subsequently moved for summary judgment, which the district court granted on April 11, 2013. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 2:34 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
Starting on Tuesday 24 April 2012 are the linked appeals of R (Alvi) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, and Secretary of State for the Home Department v Munir and anor, which are listed for three days to be heard by a panel of five (L Hope, L Walker, L Clarke, L Dyson and L Wilson). [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
The sponsors may be right (and I have written about this before) in saying that Judge Walker should not, as a matter of federal remedies law, have issued an order that granted relief beyond the two couples who actually sued. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 10:31 am by John Elwood
The likeliest grant out of last week’s relists got the nod: The Supreme Court will decide in Acheson Hotels, LLC v. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 11:55 am by Edward A. Fallone
For present purposes, I take no position on whether a recall of Governor Walker based upon his actions since taking office is a good idea. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 6:00 am
Yesterday afternoon, an eleven-judge en banc Ninth Circuit panel heard oral argument in Dukes v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 4:41 am by Broc Romanek
The Supreme Court only sits in session 35-38 days per year (as only 90 cases are granted certiorari annually out of 10,000 requests). [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 1:22 am
Walker Subscription Required QUEENS COUNTYTorts Mother's Claims of Malicious Prosecution Dismissed; Mandated Reporters Provided Qualified Immunity McIntosh v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 3:21 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Furthermore, she failed to establish that she had a potentially meritorious cause of action (see generally Rosner v Paley, 65 NY2d 736, 738; Allen v Potruch, 282 AD2d 484, 484-485; Iannacone v Weidman, 273 AD2d 275, 276-277; Rubinberg v Walker, 252 AD2d 466, 467). [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 3:25 pm by Buce
Your point seems to be that you are a proud geek while Justice Roberts is a mere dork.Okay, granted. [read post]