Search for: "Graphic Packaging"
Results 461 - 480
of 801
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2012, 6:07 pm
The new law will require that all tobacco products be sold in mostly unbranded packaging, without any logos, and include warnings about the dangers of smoking along with graphic images of the effects of smoking on the lungs. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 5:56 pm
Beginning in December, all cigarettes sold in Australia will have to be packaged in olive-green packs with stark health warnings, graphic images, and no brand logos. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 2:35 pm
(Check out this crazy graphic illustrating the myriad lawsuits between technology’s biggest companies.) [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 9:39 am
This is true for both word marks and figurative marks (graphical devices), and for signs resulting from the combination of the two, as well as so called “non-traditional” trade marks such as packaging shapes and colours per se. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 10:18 am
Take graphic representations in registrations. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 9:34 am
They were directed to cash it and wire the difference to a third party, who was supposed to be the graphics designer to pay for the cost of the design. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 1:10 am
Specifically, the Patentee challenges the acceptance of evidence from the Requesters, contending that the USPTO exceeded its authority by allowing the Requesters (suppliers, MeadWestvaco Packaging Systems LLC and Graphic Packaging International Inc.), to submit declaration evidence from Coca-Cola and Miller employees. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 10:05 pm
Similarly, when you select an eraser, instead of just having one eraser tool with an adjustable size, the app shows you graphical representations of three different sizes. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 6:38 am
I doubt that the Court will address this as it is not a reference question, so we would be looking at the Commission including such "top-up" provisions in its new Directive/CTM Regulation package (thought now possibly due for release in June after several earlier postponements). [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 12:31 am
"A panel of judges for the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit [official website] heard oral arguments on Tuesday over the constitutionality of newFood and Drug Administration (FDA) [official website] regulations [text] requiring cigarette packaging and advertisements to display more prominent graphic health warning labels [materials]. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 2:59 am
" The graphic included in the post illustrates two food products--a NutriGrain bar and a loaf of Sara Lee bread--and points out the potential sources of ingredients in each of those products. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 2:11 pm
Service “packaging” might include the appearance of a restaurant or the like. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 5:46 pm
” Judge Leon’s decision (which follows his recent ruling against FDA on the Agency’s regulation requiring the display on cigarette packages of graphic warnings – see our previous post here) stems from a February 2011 lawsuit (amended in July 2011) brought against FDA by death row inmates in three states over the importation of unapproved thiopental sodium, one of the drugs used by some states to administer a lethal injection, alleging violations of the… [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 6:15 am
Part II: Bans on advertisers’ own speech The court—now Judge Clay is back to speaking for the unanimous panel again—turned to restrictions on speech about “modified risk” tobacco products. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 6:02 am
The Act required tobacco manufacturers to “reserve a significant portion of their packaging—the top 50% of the front and back of cigarette packaging, 30% of the front and back of smokeless tobacco packaging, and 20% of tobacco advertising—for full color, graphic health warnings issued by the FDA. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 5:49 am
Upheld: restrictions on marketing “modified risk” tobacco products; bans on event sponsorship, branding non-tobacco merchandise, and free sampling; big warnings on packages; color graphic and non-graphic warning labels (as against a facial challenge to requiring the use of images); restrictions on statements regarding the relative safety of tobacco products based on FDA regulation. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 11:12 am
Reuters: Court: Tobacco health labels constitutional A U.S. law requiring large graphic health warnings on cigarette packaging and advertising does not violate the free speech rights of tobacco companies, a federal appeals court ruled on Monday. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 10:31 am
It’s a much better package overall. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 9:26 pm
Here is one of the FDA's new graphic labels slated to appear on cigarette packages if the courts say that's okay: We've blogged on this topic many times, including recently, when Judge Richard Leon of the D.C. federal district court permanently enjoined the FDA's rules as contrary to the First Amendment. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 1:12 am
The three-judge panel split on the question of the constitutionality of the color graphics requirement. [read post]
