Search for: "Greenhouse v. Greenhouse"
Results 461 - 480
of 2,350
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2012, 1:32 pm
EPA said it is proposing not to change the greenhouse gas (GHG) permitting thresholds for the Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) and Title V Operating Permit programs. [read post]
30 Jun 2007, 1:21 pm
That lede of Linda Greenhouse's just about captures the October 2006 Term.The three primary exceptions were (i) the Masschusetts v. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
Duggan v. [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 6:11 am
We can’t buy a new automobile without seat belts, a new baby’s crib without safety latches, or a new television set without a V-chip. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 3:00 am
EPA, 684 F. 3d 102, reversed in part by the Supreme Court in Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 8:31 am
In an op-ed in The New York Times, Linda Greenhouse discusses Jennings v. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 5:25 am
[Bustos v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 1:39 pm
EPA is compelled to do so by the Clean Air Act, the Supreme Court's decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 5:50 pm
The US Supreme Court heard oral arguments Monday in West Virginia v. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 7:10 am
There was some worry that the Court might overrule Massachusetts v. [read post]
4 Oct 2007, 6:10 am
Supreme Court oral argument in New York State Board of Elections v. [read post]
18 May 2020, 7:47 pm
Webster Citizens for Appropriate Land Use v. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 8:28 am
On June 11, EPA released its long-awaited Advanced Notice of Public Rulemaking (ANPR) for the regulation of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions under the Clean Air Act. [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 8:43 am
Texas v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 4:59 am
See Connecticut v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 9:05 pm
But today’s decision was not a total loss for the EPA, however, as the Court also concluded that it was reasonable for the EPA to interpret the Act to allow for the regulation of GHG [greenhouse gas] emissions from sources already subject to regulation under the PSD and Title V [large stationary source] program. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 5:21 am
Briefly: In The New York Times, Linda Greenhouse discusses last week’s grant in the two cell phone privacy cases, United States v. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 8:58 am
Abbott Friends of Oroville v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 4:15 am
Supreme Court threaded the needle in its 8-0 decision in AEP v. [read post]
28 May 2007, 6:57 am
Linda Greenhouse of the NY Times has a column today that discusses the importance of the statutory cases the Supreme Court decides to hear:More than half the cases the court agrees to hear are not constitutional, but statutory, presenting questions much like the one posed by Hackworth v. [read post]
