Search for: "Grey v. State"
Results 461 - 480
of 603
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Oct 2009, 5:25 am
Or on life support, at least - MEI v JCM American Corp stayed pending outcome of Mars v Coin Acceptors (Property, intangible) O2 Micro - ITC judge grants in part O2's motion for summary determination of importa [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 5:25 am
Or on life support, at least - MEI v JCM American Corp stayed pending outcome of Mars v Coin Acceptors (Property, intangible) O2 Micro - ITC judge grants in part O2's motion for summary determination of importa [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 1:54 am
Here, in a nutshell, is what the Court said:Adequacy of Board of Appeal’s statement of reasons The General Court had no problem finding that the Board's statement of reasons was perfectly adequate, adding that the duty to state reasons for decisions is an essential procedural requirement, the reasoning of a decision consisting in a formal statement of the grounds on which that decision is based. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 2:58 am
Khan v. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
(Excess Copyright) Chile The ambitious project that seeks to change the Chilean wine map (IP tango) China Pepsico-Tianfu JV dispute over trade secrets and branding (China Hearsay) iSuppli: China’s grey mobile phone market explodes (IP Dragon) Europe Questions referred to ECJ in Interflora v Marks and Spencer now available (IPKat) (Class 46) ECJ crystal clear ruling in border measures reference: Zino Davidoff SA v Bundesfinanzdirektion Südost… [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
(Excess Copyright) Chile The ambitious project that seeks to change the Chilean wine map (IP tango) China Pepsico-Tianfu JV dispute over trade secrets and branding (China Hearsay) iSuppli: China’s grey mobile phone market explodes (IP Dragon) Europe Questions referred to ECJ in Interflora v Marks and Spencer now available (IPKat) (Class 46) ECJ crystal clear ruling in border measures reference: Zino Davidoff SA v… [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
(Excess Copyright) Chile The ambitious project that seeks to change the Chilean wine map (IP tango) China Pepsico-Tianfu JV dispute over trade secrets and branding (China Hearsay) iSuppli: China's grey mobile phone market explodes (IP Dragon) Europe Questions referred to ECJ in Interflora v Marks and Spencer now available (IPKat) (Class 46) ECJ crystal clear ruling in border measures reference: Zino Davidoff SA v Bundesfinanzdirektion Südost (JIPLP) Brussels… [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 12:39 am
(Durex) v. [read post]
4 May 2010, 12:39 pm
” he half-asked and half-stated. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 2:50 pm
Emily Bowen, Ohio State Univ. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 6:58 am
(Class 99) Moral rights: no grey areas – SABIP’s ‘International Perspectives on Moral Rights’ debate (IPKat) ‘Film’ includes the copyright in it for tax purposes, says Court of Appeal (IP finance) United States US General Our comments to the IP Enforcement Coordinator (Public Knowledge) Public interest groups ask targeted enforcement for intellectual property (Public Knowledge) (EFF) US Patents Forest Group decision has lead to… [read post]
25 Sep 2020, 1:15 am
While most people who work for a living are classified as “employees,” truck drivers have long occupied a grey area. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 1:13 pm
Supreme Court might answer the latter question in Jesner v. [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 10:41 am
Me.) in Cheng v. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 1:45 am
Consumers have more choice (think of grey goods and parallel imports). [read post]
26 Jan 2013, 12:23 am
In a third case, in Vault Corp. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 8:48 am
No’ had been broadcast in Member States that affords special protection to film titles: Danjaq v OHIM, Mission Products (Class 46) Jesper Kongstad, Benoît Battistelli enter the fray in battle to be next EPO President (IAM) EPO sets deadline for presidential applications (Managing Intellectual Property) (IAM) The IP ecosystem (Innovationpartners) More work on draft council regulation on the EU community patent (BLOG@IP::JUR) Mr Bruno van Pottelsberghe calling for… [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 1:43 pm
That’s the question raised in the case of State of Florida v. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 11:32 am
In Anderson v. [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 2:21 pm
Metz v. [read post]
