Search for: "HAIR v. STATE"
Results 461 - 480
of 1,759
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2007, 5:52 am
Long, but it was decided only citing state cases). [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 8:17 pm
” Since the department did not demand that inmates have shaved heads or extremely short hair, reasoned the Court, it was hard to see why an inmate would seek to hide contraband in a ½-inch beard rather than in the longer hair on his head. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 9:39 pm
Domino's relied on decisions from other states suggesting the language of the franchise agreement was dispositive on the issue of control. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 6:44 am
The case is Johnson v. [read post]
4 Sep 2016, 8:28 am
The Supreme Court recently deniedpetition in the Electronic Arts v. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 7:56 am
The Fourth Circuit opinion in United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 5:24 am
No, according to Meyer v. [read post]
10 May 2007, 8:08 am
The third type of problem, exercise of power of without authority, is suggested by the Appellate Division's decision Tuesday in People of the State of New York, by Eliot Spitzer, the Attorney Gen. of the State of New York v Grasso, 2007 NY Slip Op 03990. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 5:48 am
She stated Estrada was sleeping in the room he rented in Highland Park around 6:30 a.m. on May 19, 2014 (the same time as the robbery), when she arrived to bring him food.People v. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 9:03 am
Although it was framed as a narrow question of statutory intention, Whiting did take the hair-trigger approach to state immigration activity off the table. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 1:01 pm
Fund v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 7:14 am
Happy to see RoC getting in-state attention. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 2:54 am
"Compare Lucien Piccard Watch Corp. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 12:33 pm
O'Haire v. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 7:06 am
Sewer v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 9:28 am
Heathcote Holdings Corp. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 3:42 pm
ShareDuring Tuesday’s oral argument in Cruz v. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 11:55 am
Kenya's Competition Act 2010, section 55(a)(v), prohibits false representations that "goods or services have sponsorship, approval, performance characteristics, accessories, uses or benefits they do not have. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 6:45 am
The case, Hernandez v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 1:49 pm
Verbena Products LLC v. [read post]
