Search for: "HALE v. STATE"
Results 461 - 480
of 1,075
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2014, 7:03 am
Lord Reed gave a concurring judgment, with which Lady Hale and Lord Clarke agreed. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 5:26 am
R (on the application of Cart) (Appellant) v The Upper Tribunal (Respondent); R (on the application of MR (Pakistan)) (FC) (Appellant) v The Upper Tribunal (Immigration & Asylum Chamber) and Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent) [2011] UKSC 28, 22/6/2011 – read judgment; press summary here Unappealable decisions of the Upper Tribunal are still subject to judicial review by the High Court, but only… [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 2:00 am
R (HC) v Secretary of State for Works and Pensions & Ors, heard 21-22 Jun 2017. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 11:00 am
It is difficult to conceive of a case that better fits this description than R (Miller & Anor) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 11:48 am
Indianapolis, Indiana - In the matter of American Petroleum Institute v. [read post]
23 May 2009, 7:51 am
United States, 156 U.S. 432; 15 S. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 1:01 pm
Walden v. [read post]
22 May 2019, 4:58 pm
The justices were also divided as to how to answer this question, with Lord Kerr and Lady Hale agreeing with Lord Carnwath; Lords Lloyd-Jones, Reed and Sumption declining to give a view; and Lord Wilson dissenting. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:15 am
But even in criminal proceedings account must be taken of the article 8 rights of the perceived victim: see SN v Sweden, App no 34209/96, 2 July 2002. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 10:06 pm
Lippmann is cited:Unlike in the classic case of Egbert v. [read post]
19 Sep 2020, 8:29 am
First up: the state-court case of Shahrokh Mireskandari v. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 5:57 am
Russell v. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 1:50 am
R (Johnson) v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 1:30 am
ZM v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Northern Ireland); HA (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12–14 January 2016. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 1:43 pm
The case is Javier Cardenas et al. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 3:35 am
Although Mr Seal ultimately lost, his claim – and in particular a strong dissenting judgment by Baroness Hale in the House of Lords – highlights the tricky line the state must tread in relation to people with mental health problems in relation to their access to justice. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 6:32 am
I have to say that there were some words of comfort from Lady Hale in the recent case of Dunhill v Burgin. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 3:09 am
Lady Hale agreed with the majority, but noted that since Mr Catt has not been and is not likely to be involved in criminal activity, it would have been disproportionate to keep a nominal record about him. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 11:14 am
In Reynolds American, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 1:00 am
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
