Search for: "HARPER v. HARPER"
Results 461 - 480
of 1,647
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Aug 2013, 11:29 am
A Environmental Appeal Board ruling has limited the British Columbia Ministry of Environment’s powers to withhold compliance certificates from owners of contaminated land.Burquitlam Building Ltd. and Morguard REIT v. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 5:44 am
Whittingham – Unilaterally Moving the Child Supreme Court of Canada to determine fate of Senate reform after Harper reference District Court Dismisses Kosher Fraud Lawsuit Against ConAgra Working for free: Lawyers incorporating pro bono into their lives talk about its rewards, challenges Legal Skills Prof Blog: How to not suck as a public speaker New B.C. [read post]
5 Apr 2014, 8:08 am
In Matter of Albany Basketball & Sports Corp. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 1:23 pm
The Court in Biden v. [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 1:42 pm
Harper, which involved congressional elections. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:07 am
Similarly in Kyllo v. [read post]
20 Apr 2022, 11:02 am
Ariel Katz in the first case (CBC v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 9:03 am
Cort v. [read post]
19 May 2007, 9:13 am
Ken Kosky of the NWI Times reports today on Thursday's NFP Court of Appeals decision in John Kadish, Anita Kadish, and 2 Dreams, LLC v. [read post]
1 Dec 2007, 7:33 am
Bush v. [read post]
12 May 2023, 10:11 am
In December, the justices heard argument in Moore v. [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 1:50 pm
The court held in the cases of People v Harper, People v Thomas, Smith v Commissioner of Motor Vehicles and People v Schook that a roadside Alco-Sensor screening test is sufficiently reliable for use in determining the presence of alcohol on a pass/fail basis, if properly administered an Alco-Sensor test can help establish probable cause for the arrest of a DWI suspect. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 9:00 pm
Armour v. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 3:05 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 1:30 pm
(Harte-Hanks Shoppers) Review denied in Harper v. [read post]
26 Sep 2018, 8:25 am
That statutory silence led courts to conclude that exoneration clauses in inter vivos trust instruments generally were enforceable, except to the extent that they sought to excuse a trustee from liability for gross negligence, reckless indifference, self-dealing, or bad faith (see Matter of Tydings, 32 Misc3d 1204[A], at *6 [Sur Ct, Bronx County 2011]; Boles v Lanham, 55 AD3d 647, 648 [2d Dep’t 2008] [opining that a “trustee is liable if he or she commits a breach of trust in… [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 6:36 am
Health Services, [2007] SCR 391, SCC 27 and CUPE v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 8:55 am
Bashir v. [read post]
23 May 2019, 5:31 am
Importantly, this conclusion is consistent with the Supreme Court’s instruction in Harper & Row Publishers, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2024, 8:11 pm
[On March 15, 2024] the publishers (Hachette, Harper Collins, John Wiley, and Penguin Random House) filed their reply brief on appeal in their long-running lawsuit against Internet Archive, which challenges (among other things) the practice of controlled digital lending. [read post]
