Search for: "Hahn"
Results 461 - 480
of 848
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2014, 11:30 am
Jong-Hee Hahn (Yonsei University), Yun Jeong Choi (Yonsei University) and Jinsoo Bae (Ohio State University) ask Fixed and mobile broadband; Are they substitutes or complements? [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 7:24 am
Hahn, Note, "Between" a Rock and a Hard Place: Martin Marietta v. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 9:34 am
The right of way referred to in the patent was obtained by the Laramie, Hahn’s Peak and Pacific Railroad (LHP&P) in 1908, pursuant to the 1875 Act. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 4:08 pm
Other nicknames of note would be Scarface (Al Capone),The Terminator (Antoly Onoprienko), Arsenic Anna (Anne Marie Hahn), Angel of Death (Beverly Allitt), Cell Phone Bandit (Candice Rose Martinez), and in the Daily Appellate Report is a case (People v. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 3:22 pm
“She will never be that person she was before September 7, 2011” Frank Mages Ms. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 5:00 am
This directly implicates the language in Hahn [quotation of “only recognized” language omitted]. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 4:00 am
Other firms such as Adams & Adams and Hahn & Hahn Inc also tell us that prior to December 2004, Morocco had more than one zone which meant that separate IP applications had to be made to cover the entire Kingdom.ConclusionGoing by the AU, one could be forgiven for thinking that Western Sahara is a separate territory to consider for IP protection. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm
The Hahns have accordingly excluded from the group-health-insurance plan they offer to their employees certain contraceptive methods that they consider to be abortifacients. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 6:30 am
Keynote addresses will be delivered by Professors Steven Hahn, University of Pennsylvania; Pekka Hämäläinen, Oxford University; Erika Pani, Colegio de Mexico; and Andrew Smith, University of Liverpool. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 11:00 am
People should be able to exercise their religious freedom when owning and operating corporate entities — and as far as this case goes, the Hahns and the Greens were entirely unencumbered in the exercise of their religious beliefs. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 5:00 am
., Sarah Hahn's guest post earlier this week), apparently relies in part on the fact that shareholders (and, potentially, employees and other relevant constituents of the firm) know that... [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 7:10 pm
The Hahns and Greens believe life begins at conception. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 7:19 am
The Hahns, owners of Conestoga, believed that two forms of emergency contraception approved by the FDA cause abortion, so that coverage violates their Mennonite beliefs. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 1:07 pm
The following is a contribution from guest blogger Sarah Hahn, Associate Professor of Law at the University of Idaho College of Law. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 12:19 pm
The Court dismisses that evaluation as judging the sincerity of the Green/Hahn religious belief, which is (appropriately) above judicial judgment. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 8:24 pm
From today's opinion upholding a corporation's challenge under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of the contraception coverage requirement under Obamacare:As we will show, Congress provided protection for people like the Hahns and Greens by employing a familiar legal fiction: It included corporations within RFRA’s definition of “persons. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 7:20 pm
America has been built on the backs of small-business owning families like the Greens and the Hahns. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 2:08 pm
Alito discusses the Hahn family and its business (Conestoga Wood Specialties, the other set of plaintiffs in the case), and the Green family and Hobby Lobby, which now has more than 500 stores, he notes. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 11:17 am
“[T]he Hahns and Greens and their companies sincerely believe that providing the insurance coverage demanded by the HHS regulations lies on the forbidden side of the line, and it is not for us to say that their religious beliefs are mistaken or insubstantial. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 7:19 am
Here’s part of the majority’s explanation of why it concluded that for-profit corporations are covered (paragraph breaks added): As we will show, Congress provided protection for people like the Hahns and Greens by employing a familiar legal fiction: It included corporations within RFRA’s definition of “persons. [read post]
