Search for: "Haire v. State"
Results 461 - 480
of 1,762
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Mar 2018, 6:22 am
” Vickers v. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 2:00 am
State v. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 9:00 am
Mario Tricoci Hair Salons & Day Spas, Inc., 2012 IL App (2d) 110624, § 22. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 6:41 am
And while his FMLA retaliation claim survived summary judgment, his FMLA interference claim did not (Lewis v. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 12:04 pm
This is essentially the issue that the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) had to address in Sekmadienis v Lithuania (Appl No 69317/14). [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 4:16 pm
Webb v. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 12:45 pm
Agents of the state asked my name. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 9:30 pm
And, speaking of comedy, as much as we enjoy the political humor of late-night talk show hosts, the most incisive satirists are still editorial cartoonists.ICYMI: LHB Guest Blogger Mary Ziegler, professor of law at Florida State University, had an op-ed in the New York Times, Roe v. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 9:49 am
Expressions Hair Design, et al. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 10:47 am
This included a brief from 17 leading economists [PDF] in the case of Eldred v Ashcroft, which was an (ultimately unsuccessful) legal challenge to the U.S. copyright term extension law. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 10:47 am
This included a brief from 17 leading economists [PDF] in the case of Eldred v Ashcroft, which was an (ultimately unsuccessful) legal challenge to the U.S. copyright term extension law. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 11:00 am
(Click here for more on northern spotted v. barred.) [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 11:17 am
But the Ninth Circuit is the first to address the question since the Supreme Court’s decision in Expressions Hair Design v. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 11:17 am
But the Ninth Circuit is the first to address the question since the Supreme Court’s decision in Expressions Hair Design v. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:10 am
Thus, Gravano's and Lohan's claims that Take-Two impermissibly used their likeness in Grand Theft Auto V, or in material promoting Grand Theft Auto V, must fail. [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 10:37 am
While the status of an employer’s obligation to accommodate marijuana usage for medical reasons under state law also appears to remain unchanged following Prop 64’s passage, the controlling California case on this issue, Ross v. [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 10:55 am
States like California have a great deal on the line in Janus v. [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 6:20 am
The court dismissed her hostile and discriminatory work environment claims as not administratively exhausted and her negligence claim as untimely, however (Radek v. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 6:18 am
(Nevada was easy: In 2014, the state supreme court in Terry v. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 11:40 am
Topics this month include:Top StoriesUS v. [read post]