Search for: "Harris v. Page"
Results 461 - 480
of 953
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2014, 7:37 am
See Harris Interactive, 2013 Mobile Consumer Habits Study (June 2013). [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 8:19 am
Garner through Scott v. [read post]
28 May 2014, 4:48 am
In Plumhoff v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 3:33 am
Harris relied upon Henderson v Henderson to argue that any claims against him personally should have been brought along with the original copyright infringement action against Newzbin. [read post]
Federal Middle District Court Addresses Parameters of Discovery of Claims File in UIM Bad Faith Case
16 May 2014, 6:00 am
In her recent March 10, 2014 Opinion in the case of Shaffer v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 7:00 am
At only 130 pages, it’s the perfect book to accompany you on a flight, by the pool, or on the beach. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 9:30 pm
Co. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 6:02 am
All records on the Device described in Attachment A that reference or relate to violations of Title 18, United States Code, Section 175 . . . and involve DANIEL HARRY MILZMAN, including: a. [read post]
6 Apr 2014, 3:34 am
State v. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 4:00 am
In Harris v. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 7:43 am
EEOC v. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 2:15 pm
(Though that doesn't stop Judge Milan Smith from writing a nine-page concurrence, in which he complains about -- and disagrees with -- the last paragraph of the per curiam opinion. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 11:48 am
Siemenski: we don’t really know because there are too few cases, because of the great imbalance of power between those sending the notices and those receiving them—big corporations v. individual users.Coble for Bridy: should Congress create incentives for voluntary systems to address infringement, and if so what? [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 11:31 am
Coakley, and Harris v. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 7:52 am
Nov. 19, 2007), and Harris v. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 10:16 am
In Zelman v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 9:48 am
Mar. 15, 2013) (noting that predictive coding is “an automated method that credible sources say has been demonstrated to result in more accurate searches at a fraction of the cost of human reviewers” and relying in part on its availability to reject a law firm’s undue burden objection to a subpoena served on it); Harris v. [read post]
12 Jan 2014, 11:53 am
V. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 6:43 am
They’re also obviously at risk of simply describing, in a laudatory manner, characteristics of the goods or services in question.CJEU Cases C-398/08 P Audi AG v OHIM (VORSPRUNG DURCH TECHNIK) and C-311/11 P Smart Technologies ULC v OHIM (WIR MACHEN DAS BESONDERE EINFACH), already blogged by Jeremy hereand here, set out the position in Europe. [read post]
