Search for: "Holder v. Williams" Results 461 - 480 of 680
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Nov 2017, 6:31 am by Wolfgang Demino
Godoy guaranteed the promissory note.GDG defaulted on the note, and Wells Fargo — Wachovia's successor by merger and holder of the note — foreclosed on the real property securing the note on November 1, 2011. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 7:07 am by Mandelman
They bring in a sworn declaration from MERS Treasurer and Corporate Secretary, William Hultman on December 10th, that explains what an entirely fabulous and utterly wonderful invention MERS actually is, and then… I suppose afraid that the one Hultman declaration just might not carry the day they show up with yet another declaration from MERS Treasurer and Corporate Secretary, William Hultman on December 23rd. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 1:19 pm by ligitsec
Time had agreed to purchase the exclusive right to print prepublication excerpts from the copyright holders, Harper & Row Publishers, Inc. [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 6:06 am
Roper, Stanford University, on Thursday, September 1, 2016 Tags: Basic, Disclosure, Erica John Fund v. [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 11:13 am
Should it be a contributory infringement to supply a computer program that was essential to putting an invention into effect (as was found in Menashe v William Hill)? [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 3:41 pm by Katie Smith, ACLU
The stories of women involved in the case, Dukes v. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 12:01 pm
Williams , No. 07-2716 Conviction and sentence for drug crimes and firearms possession is affirmed where: 1) defendant's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel fails as district court properly held that counsel's failure to call three possible defense witnesses was not unreasonable, [read post]
16 May 2022, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
MSNBC’s Andrea Mitchell and former Clinton Attorney General Eric Holder had a preposterous discussion of how if Roe goes down, Brown v. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 8:29 am by Andrew Hamm
United States) “In Defense of Unprincipled Decision Making” (describing Justice William Douglas’ penumbral theory in Griswold v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 2:12 am
This Kat thinks that under US law the response should be pretty straightforward, in the sense of 'No' being likely answer, as any potentially infringing activities might be considered fair use within §107 of the Copyright Act, particularly because of their transformative nature [as recent examples, see Cariou v Prince, here, and Seltzer v Green Day, here]. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Spicy IP) Design v copyright: need for a clear and rational distinction: Microfibres v Giridhar & Co & Ors (Spicy IP) Madras High Court: jurisdiction - can design infringement case can be filed in Court where plaintiff resides? [read post]