Search for: "Holding v. State"
Results 461 - 480
of 69,734
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Nov 2006, 3:02 am
Since the New York Court of Appeals' holdings in Great Canal Realty Corp. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 12:05 am
United States: 23 For Government, 1 For Taxpayer: Reply Brief For Petitioners, Moore v. [read post]
21 May 2015, 9:04 am
<> Committee for a Better Arvin v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 10:30 am
The Court also may be holding Young v. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 4:45 pm
“The State of Texas v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 11:12 am
Ninth Circuit holds that Bond v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 5:20 pm
“State Judges Are in Spotlight After Supreme Court Overrules Roe v. [read post]
7 Aug 2016, 6:20 pm
Sentencing Guidelines is not unconstitutionally vague under Johnson v. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 10:44 am
Here are the materials in United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 4:26 pm
” The court ordered the state legislature to come up with a new plan by January 24, but tonight the Supreme Court put that order on hold, to give the state’s Republicans time to appeal. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 10:56 am
This form of interconstitutionalism plays an important role in Moore v. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 11:22 am
Hubbard v. [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 9:00 am
United States, No. 18-3287 (3rd Cir. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 8:01 am
The post State v. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 8:01 am
The post State v. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 8:25 am
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law In its opinion in Espinoza v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 3:07 pm
" Dolan v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 7:37 am
Therefore, papers or proposals which either (1) evaluate the future of the judiciary and the administrative state; or (2) offer an evaluation of the jurisprudential value of the holding in West Virginia v. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s 2022 decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 7:25 am
The Alabama Supreme Court refused, holding that the Full Faith and Credit Clause of the United States Constitution did not require the Alabama courts to respect the Georgia judgment. [read post]