Search for: "Holding v. State"
Results 461 - 480
of 63,733
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2022, 10:56 am
This form of interconstitutionalism plays an important role in Moore v. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 8:01 am
The post State v. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 8:01 am
The post State v. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 8:25 am
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law In its opinion in Espinoza v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 7:37 am
Therefore, papers or proposals which either (1) evaluate the future of the judiciary and the administrative state; or (2) offer an evaluation of the jurisprudential value of the holding in West Virginia v. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s 2022 decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 3:07 pm
" Dolan v. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 7:25 am
The Alabama Supreme Court refused, holding that the Full Faith and Credit Clause of the United States Constitution did not require the Alabama courts to respect the Georgia judgment. [read post]
19 May 2008, 11:39 pm
Reeves v. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 8:00 am
C.R. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 5:03 pm
That constitutional provision bars certain people who have“engaged in insurrection or rebellion against” the United States from holding specified state and federal government offices. [read post]
6 Sep 2024, 5:04 am
United States, 593 U.S. 420 (2021). [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 9:45 am
California Building Industry Association v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 3:22 pm
” United States v. [read post]
24 May 2019, 2:00 am
Hall, 440 U.S. 410 (1979), holding that states retain their sovereign immunity from private suits brought in courts of other states. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 12:40 pm
United States, 09-1395, have been released from holds, likely in wake of yesterday’s decision in Wal-Mart v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 7:41 pm
Airways, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 6:19 am
Recently the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
19 May 2008, 3:04 am
The Supreme Court reversed, holding that the "maximum term of imprisonment . . . prescribed by law" for the state drug convictions at issue includes state recidivist enhancements, which in this case was a ten-year maximum. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 11:27 am
The post State v. [read post]
