Search for: "Howard Wasserman"
Results 461 - 480
of 547
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2019, 7:15 am
Howard Wasserman has this blog’s opinion analysis. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 8:08 am
Commentary and analysis come from Howard Wasserman at PrawfsBlawg (here and here), Kevin Snider at JURIST, and Fred Woocher at the Election Law Blog, who discusses what the voting alignment suggests about the Justices’ views of the merits of the case. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 4:28 am
Howard Wasserman challenges the assumptive reasons offered by the op-ed, and as noted in the comments by other law profs, the extent to which even the assumptive reasons apply varies greatly from school to school, professor to professor. [read post]
15 May 2018, 4:19 am
Howard Wasserman analyzes the opinion for this blog. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 4:45 am
At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman suggests that a “better solution might have been that there is a final judgment in the dismissal order, but that there are prudential limits on a court reviewing a voluntary dismissal, just as there are prudential limits on a court taking appeals from the winners below. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 12:49 pm
But unlike Mildred Jeter and Richard Loving, whose love story and legal victory in the aptly named case have become iconic cultural references and given birth to a holiday, Palmore did not produce a similar happy ending for Linda Sidoti Palmore and her family.I recently revisited Palmore to write a chapter about it for a forthcoming book, Painting Constitutional Law (edited by Howard Wasserman and M.C. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 4:09 am
Howard Wasserman has this blog’s opinion analysis. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 4:21 am
’” At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman takes issue with the baseball analogy. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 3:50 am
At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman notes that “[i]f any case not on all factual fours with Bivens represents a new context, the majority gets where Justice Thomas wants to go, without the political cost of overrulings. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 9:05 am
(See Margot Kaminski, Paul Ohm, Howard Wasserman, Tom Goldstein, and the terrifyingly prolific Orin Kerr.) [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 4:33 am
At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman notes that “Gorsuch’s dissent emphasized a concern that arose during arguments–that state courts may now have to deal with claims that were untimely by many years,” but explains that “[s]uch timing should not be a significant concern in the mine run of cases. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 4:26 am
Prawfsblawg features two discussions of the process by which opinion-writers are assigned at the Supreme Court and the justices’ use of the assignment power, from Howard Wasserman here and Ian Samuel here. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 4:40 am
” At Prawfsblawgs, Howard Wasserman argues in favor of a filibuster by Senate Democrats, but notes that “the framing of the strategy is going to be essential” and that “the Democrats need to find their own principle beyond tit-for-tat. [read post]
5 Apr 2020, 3:47 am
Howard Wasserman raises some questions about the efficacy of online teaching. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 5:33 am
Commentary on the case comes from Ruthann Robson at Constitutional Law Prof Blog, who writes that the Court’s “relatively short and unanimous opinion breaks no new ground”; from Garrett Epps of The Atlantic, who predicts that both the Ohio law at issue in the case and other similar laws will “go down in the next few years”; from Lisa Soronen at the blog of the National Conference of State Legislatures, who observes that the case “should be of more interest… [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 4:28 am
It started at PrawfsBlawg, with lawprof Howard Wasserman free-riding the coattails of Cornell lawprof Mike Dorf, with the Wass-man noting “Mike share [sic] my view that cameras are a good idea but not a panacea. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 4:11 am
Howard Wasserman comments on the scope of nationwide injunctions by analyzing a footnote in Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s dissent, and James Phillips examines a footnote in Justice Elena Kagan’s concurrence and argues that it misreads the majority opinion Kagan joined in Our Lady of Guadalupe. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 9:05 am
(See Margot Kaminski, Paul Ohm, Howard Wasserman, Tom Goldstein, and the terrifyingly prolific Orin Kerr.) [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 5:18 am
” Commentary on Garland’s nomination and the effect that Garland would have on the Court if he were confirmed comes from Howard Wasserman, who at PrawfsBlawg agrees with Geoffrey Stone that Garland would “move the Court left, but not back to the days of a bloc of six reliably liberal Justices”; Erwin Chemerinsky, who in The Atlantic imagines what it might “mean to have five justices on the Supreme Court who were appointed by Democratic… [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 4:31 am
At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman takes note of the lower court’s actions following the Supreme Court’s decision earlier this term in Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. [read post]
