Search for: "IDE v STATE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTIC"
Results 461 - 480
of 1,612
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Feb 2023, 5:59 am
Recently the Biden Administration and Department of Justice (“DOJ”) have closely scrutinized private equity’s control over healthcare providers. [read post]
14 Jul 2022, 4:42 pm
By James V. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 5:56 am
Shen v. [read post]
25 Oct 2006, 8:36 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 12:14 pm
In adopting the ministerial exception, the Court distinguished its prior holding in Employment Division, Department of Human Resources of Oregon v. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 8:36 am
STEPHANIE KAY LANNINGon writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the tenth circuit[June 7, 2010] Justice Alito delivered the opinion of the Court. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 5:38 am
’ Id. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 5:08 am
Id. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 4:16 pm
In 1993 the United States Supreme Court decided Daubert v. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 1:25 pm
What preclearance meant in practice was that certain states and jurisdictions with documented histories of voting discrimination could not enforce photo ID laws, for example, without showing that the ID requirement did not discriminate on the basis of race. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 12:36 am
The European Court of Human Rights in the decision Bayev and others v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 6:30 am
Preclearance by the Justice Department under the Voting Rights Act’s Section 5 had the biggest impact until it was demolished by the Supreme Court in Shelby County. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 3:51 am
By order dated May 9, 2019, the Appellate Division, First Department affirmed Justice Edmead’s order of dismissal. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 9:57 am
” Id. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 12:31 pm
People v. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 12:42 pm
Id.; see also State v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 5:24 am
Id. at 2792-93; see also Ainsworth v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 8:32 am
In Ali v. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 2:07 pm
(For more on the current state of the doctrine, see this post.) [read post]
6 Sep 2021, 11:52 am
According to Plaintiffs, it wasn’t until the mother of one of the boys contacted an agent of the Department of Homeland Security, who initiated contact with Twitter and requested the removal of the material, that Twitter finally took down the posts, nine days later. [read post]
