Search for: "IN RE JOHN B." Results 461 - 480 of 3,494
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2007, 11:56 am
In this Feb. 6th entry, the ILB reported on the case of John Doe v. [read post]
9 Jan 2008, 8:40 pm
It's rare that a story about a judge manages to be both too bizarre and too vague for inclusion in this Judges' Hall of Fame, but the celebrated story of Cleveland, Tennessee's Judge John B. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 4:43 am by SHG
The problem here is that we’re talking about a warrant to seize emails. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 3:16 pm by Meg Martin
Murphy of Williams, Porter, Day & Neville, PC, Casper, Wyoming representing Vicki Means Nelson and Real Estate Professionals, Inc., d/b/a Re/Max Professionals.Facts/Discussion: In November 2005 the Throckmartins purchased a house in Gillette. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 4:05 am
In this consolidated opposition to registration of the mark SOYSALUD for various products in classes 29, 30, and 32, applicant filed a motion to amend its opposed Section 1(b) intent-to-use applications to limit the goods (various beverages) to soy-based products. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 3:00 am
In re Ocean Technology, Inc., Serial No. 87405151 (July 18, 2019) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Cindy B. [read post]
12 Aug 2018, 4:07 pm by Andrew Delaney
Sandra Penland and John Warren were previously married and got divorced. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 3:46 am
Opposer asked the Board to deny the motion and to allow the parties time to complete the settlement.The Board then asked for "documentation of the settlement," but opposer supplied only a statement that its attorney had sent the latest settlement proposal to applicant on March 28, 2016, and that the parties were still negotiating.Applicant responded that the parties had not reached settlement and that the negotiations did not constitute good and sufficient cause to avoid judgment.The Board… [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 2:57 am
In re Woodbolt Distribution LLC d/b/a Nutrabolt, Serial No. 86627384 (April 18, 2018) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Michael B. [read post]
5 Nov 2012, 7:55 pm by John W. Arden
The appellate court ruled that the lower court satisfied the “rigorous analysis” standard established by the Third Circuit in In re Hydrogen Peroxide Antitrust Litigation (552 F.3d 305, 2008-2 Trade Cases ¶76,453) in determining that questions of fact or law common to class members predominated over individual issues, for purposes of meeting the certification requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(3). [read post]