Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF C. S., A CHILD, (FATHER)"
Results 461 - 480
of 877
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Sep 2008, 10:54 am
It reversed the decision concerning Father's visitation, specifically paragraphs 13.c. through 13.l. of the Amended Decree of Divorce and remanded to the district court. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] N.J. Appellate Court Affirms Family Court Judge's Refusal to Order COVID Vaccination
29 Apr 2023, 10:59 am
In a comprehensive written decision, the trial judge summarized the evidence and applied the best interests of the child factors set forth in N.J.S.A. 9:2-4(c). [read post]
13 May 2019, 6:02 am
The trial court’s direction to Father that he must take the child to certain named therapists was overreaching, once Father had sole LDM. [read post]
13 May 2019, 6:02 am
The trial court’s direction to Father that he must take the child to certain named therapists was overreaching, once Father had sole LDM. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 8:54 pm
Kaye discussed the voice of the child, nothing that Reg 16(c)(3) imposes more onerous wording than the HAC, and additional evidential requirements. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 6:00 am
One of my earliest memories as a child is visiting my father at a house he was remodeling and riding on his lap in a skip loader. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 2:10 pm
Third, a Nassau County Child Custody Lawyer said that based upon the totality of the circumstances, and in consonance with the court’s ruling in Eschbach v Eschbach (1982), the award of custody to the father herein would certainly serve the best interests of the subject child. [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 5:30 am
R who was brutally beaten many times by his father as a child. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 10:45 am
Kenneth C. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:44 am
An illegitimate child of a Sudra born from a slave or a permanently kept concubine is entitled to share in his father's property, along with the legitimate children.16. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 7:58 am
Mercis B.V. has been managing and protecting the cartoonist's interests since 1971, as well exploiting relevant rights. [read post]
20 Nov 2021, 5:54 am
The starting point is that these constitutionally protected "right[s] and liberty interest[s] necessarily exist coterminously, and jointly, in two people—the child's mother and the child's father. [read post]
28 Aug 2010, 11:58 am
The ECJ’s judgment in case C- 211/10 PPU was pronounced on 1 July 2010; it has been published today (OJ C 234, 28 August 2010). [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 6:45 pm
And, as this case graphically illustrates, the courts are taking years trying to sort through who gets to litigate and what is in a child’s best interests. [read post]
26 May 2012, 9:26 am
CAAF’s opinion in Barberi begins by noting that the government charged the child pornography offense as an Article 134 clause 1 & 2 violation, but that the trial judge’s instructions to the members incorporated definitions contained in the Child Pornography Prevention Act of 1996 (CPPA) (18 U.S.C. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 2:30 am
In answering that question, the Supreme Court had to take into account the child’s bests interests and his relationship with each parent. [read post]
28 Feb 2015, 3:48 pm
The Court has no problem allowing two adults, in normal civil litigation, to have their own remedies against an attorney who disregards its orders, however, such is not in the child's best interest when he or she has a County Attorney acting on its behalf. [read post]
18 Oct 2006, 11:49 pm
Is it (a) withdraw from the representation of the client and advise her to seek objective counsel; (b) withdraw from the representation and engage counsel of his own to litigate the paternity claim; (c) withdraw from the representation, engage his own counsel, and appoint a guardian pro tem for the child; or (d) all of the above, while also retaining complete confidentiality of the client's information, including any client information that affects his personal… [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 7:06 pm
Below are a few of the recent decisions that I found interesting. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 4:00 am
This sets up an interesting tension: political beliefs should not be used to dismiss a party’s case, but judges may comment on political issues. [read post]
