Search for: "INTERNATIONAL CUSTOM PRODUCTS V US"
Results 461 - 480
of 2,178
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Oct 2009, 9:56 pm
These nations argue that protection of intellectual property rights through patents and copyrights would raise market prices to a level near a monopolistic environment.[4] The belief is that an innovative foreign company will not pay royalties for the imported product while the domestic company has to do so, thus resulting in the product being more expensive in the importing country.[5] This is the big problem when it comes to trying to break down the remaining barriers of… [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 9:56 am
Customs and Border Protection but are authoritative interpretations of the international parts of the tariff, state that the nuts of Heading 0802 include "pignolia nuts (seeds of the Pinus pinea). [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 1:30 am
Some of the main decisions here are Daimler AG v Együd Garage Gépjárműjavító és Értékesítő Kft, Coty Germany GmbH v Amazon Services Europe Sàrl, Google France SARL and Google Inc. v Louis Vuitton Malletier SA and L’Oréal SA v eBay International AG. [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 1:30 am
Some of the main decisions here are Daimler AG v Együd Garage Gépjárműjavító és Értékesítő Kft, Coty Germany GmbH v Amazon Services Europe Sàrl, Google France SARL and Google Inc. v Louis Vuitton Malletier SA and L’Oréal SA v eBay International AG. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 10:38 am
Gnosis sold its product to six customers, both directly and indirectly, during this time. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 10:30 am
Gnosis sold its product to six customers, both directly and indirectly, during this time. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 1:19 am
” Jacobs v. [read post]
23 May 2016, 5:51 am
Co. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 10:04 am
“It chose to use a dieresis (ü) in its mark to give the brand an international feel, consistent with the company’s international aspirations. [read post]
14 Nov 2023, 7:38 am
Tempur Sealy International, Inc. et al. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 6:34 am
“It is at least plausible that customers viewing this menu would be likely to mistakenly believe that the two products are affiliated. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 3:58 pm
As to reliability, the Court examined whether the expert could “testify about what ‘functionalities’ customers use in the absence of any direct knowledge. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 5:52 am
United Tactical Systems v. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 2:13 am
Comment The judgment shows that reputed trade marks will not always be spared from revocation, and that in the assessment of trade mark use, it matters how customers view the products. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 12:01 pm
It did not, therefore, significantly depart from the norm and customs of the relevant sector. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 8:02 am
Converse v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 6:00 am
Jockey International Inc v Darren Wilkinson [2010] ATMO 22Jockey is the registered owner of a number of trade marks relating to underwear featuring JOCKEY as a component. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 2:47 pm
Supreme Court's decision in K Mart Corp. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 1:17 am
Royalty-free use for the first few years? [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 12:11 pm
Today, Canada’s Supreme Court upheld a worldwide interlocutory injunction against Google in Google Inc. v. [read post]
