Search for: "In Interest of Ac"
Results 461 - 480
of 2,338
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2019, 5:34 am
The Board in T 1063/18 (Pepper) found that the AC Rule amendment was void. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 6:00 am
It is not enough for the Federalist Society (nor would it be for the ACS) to assure that compatible judges are nominated. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 1:18 pm
Campinos announced that he would ‘proceed swiftly to submit the referral (…) to restore legal certainty fully and speedily in the interest of the users of the European patent system and the general public. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 5:38 am
Chirelstein's Concepts and Case Analysis in the Law of Contracts) to upper-level topics and bar exam or career preparation, there is likely to be a title of interest for you. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 8:54 am
It will be interesting to see how much of the upcoming Supreme Court argument in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 8:09 am
The basis on which it had been suggested that this was a decision taken in the public interest was, Mrs Finucane argued, spurious. [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 7:22 am
I've had this post on my 'to do list' for some time, but have finally been nudged into action by coverage this week of some research on the topic in the Times : Social workers ‘spying’ on families through Facebook (sorry, paywall). [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 8:15 am
As Baroness Hale DPSC said in Aintree University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust v James [2014] AC 591 , para 35: “The authorities are all agreed that the starting point is a strong presumption that it is in a person’s best interests to stay alive. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 5:17 pm
Causes of action for invasion of privacy exist in English and NZ law: Campbell v MGN ([2004] 2 AC 457) and Hosking v Runting ([2005] 1 NZLR 1). [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 4:14 am
There are the students who enter with neither interest to learn nor appreciation of education. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 9:17 am
Maguire and Access Copyright.Portions of the draft tariffs in respect of rates and interest factors have not been included in the attached versions. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 5:32 pm
After he pleaded guilty to the offences, Bean J concluded that it was in the public interest for the original identity of the defendant to be known. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 5:42 am
Here's the meat of our argument: [* * *] This Case Is of Great General Interest and Involves a Substantial Constitutional Question [1.] [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 11:30 am
CEB has posted its on-demand 1.5-hour webinar program Key Developments in California Appellate Practice 2018 (recorded 1/10/19 in San Diego), starring 4/1's Justice Dato, CALG's Susan Horst, and Manatt's Ben Shatz.LACBA's Appellate Courts Section presents The Argument Clinic on 2/28, featuring Justices Gilbert, Grimes and Segal.LACBA's ACS presents its annual Phil Goar Night of the Roundtables on 3/19, covering appellate motions, records, research attorney… [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:01 am
Here is a brief summary of some interesting points covered in the decision.The application (EP2753168) relates to a new pepperIs the TBA bound by the EBA's interpretation of the Articles? [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 3:02 pm
The text of these tariffs is based, respectively, on the 2012 AUCC Model Licence (Exhibit AC‐2V), and the University Three‐Year Premium Licence (Exhibit AC‐23N). [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 10:47 pm
Nevertheless we secured a majority consisting of those preferring subsidiarity (obviously also including my UKIP friends and ODS from the Czech Republic), politicians interested in sane competition policy, and supporters of the wildly popular teams in my camp.Apart from those two situations, I only got involved with one other "lobbying" effort: the 2006 resolution on EPLA, a predecessor to the Unified Patent Court (UPC). [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 1:40 pm
An ACS v. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 12:49 pm
In the legal profession, the Dupont Legal Model and Jeff Carr’s ACES model are examples of this approach. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 4:47 pm
That was rejected by the Supreme Court’s majority as being based upon a misreading of earlier authorities, in particular R (T) v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester Police [2015] AC 49. [read post]
