Search for: "In Re Kerr"
Results 461 - 480
of 1,239
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2015, 8:31 am
Later in the same Reddit AMA, Snowden makes the point more directly about where the important changes are happening: [M]any of the changes that are happening are invisible because they’re happening at the engineering level. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 5:33 am
Double hell, sometimes they even get paid extra when they’re successful at it. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 7:27 am
" As happy as I am to see this quote, I have to really as Orin Kerr one thing, "you're just now figuring that out?? [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 3:42 am
No judge is fooled by the fact that we’re in court representing a client. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 1:39 am
Citing In re B (A Child) (Care Proceedings Threshold Criteria) [2013] 1 WLR 1911, Kerr LJ considered that the issues which justify a very high hurdle for an appeal on an issue of primary fact apply (though with somewhat less force) in relation to an appeal regarding evaluation of facts. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 11:05 pm
The Punishments Meted Out, or Pending, For The First Two Protests We’re now approaching the big question: What’s the proper punishment, if any, for the latest round of 99Rise protestors? [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 3:06 am
At The Volokh Conspiracy, Orin Kerr analyzes the Court’s summary opinion in Grady v. [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 6:55 am
Orin Kerr noted that the outcomes of these cases will have significant implications for the program, whether decisions are published before or after Congress takes action on Section 215. [read post]
21 Mar 2015, 1:24 pm
He lists several recent examples (in addition to those identified by the VC’s Orin Kerr in 2012.) [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 2:54 am
Re then provides a “non-exhaustive” list of law review articles taken from opinions authored by CJ Roberts, which notably includes some collected by Orin Kerr. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 4:52 am
Kerr, a privacy law expert at George Washington University. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 5:00 am
One of our readers sent us that brief (a publicly filed document) and asked us to comment.So we will, but we’re not identifying either the case or the plaintiff’s lawyer – if you’re reading, you know who you are.To us, the plaintiff’s proposition is, in one word, absurd. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 11:24 am
First, the numbers we’re talking about are pretty small. [read post]
14 Feb 2015, 5:03 am
Orin Kerr, on the twitters, questioned what experience was at stake: Also, what “experience” matters? [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 9:43 pm
” It turned out that “Andrews” was actually an adult police officer, proof that on the Internet nobody knows you’re a cop. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 6:00 am
Below the fold is Version 3.1 of the census of law prof Twitter users. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 12:35 am
I’ve read a lot of criticism recently about the sentencing of Barrett Brown. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 10:05 pm
So if we’re going to ask whether there is an originalist argument for same-sex marriage, I think it’s helpful to stay at least somewhat connected to the public understanding of the term. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 4:00 am
They’re just neglecting one crucial factor: your clients…. [read post]
24 Jan 2015, 6:41 am
And under Whren, the Court allows such steps even if they’re the real reason the officer made the stop. [read post]
