Search for: "In Re Search Warrant" Results 461 - 480 of 4,114
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Dec 2008, 1:49 pm
I don't see how the plain view doctrine can apply to the extent that the remote searches we're hypothesizing would be conducted by a program, not a person operating the program. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 8:36 am by Michael Kraut
This court said that making it a crime to refuse a blood or urine test in a DUI case implicates a defendant’s fundamental right to be free from unconstitutional searches. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 12:26 pm
June 23, 2008): [T]he Supreme Court has recognized "that a third party's inspection of the contents of private books, papers, memoranda, etc. could be so complete that there would be no additional search by the [government] when it re-examines the materials. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 5:00 am by Gritsforbreakfast
So I was interested to notice soon thereafter a story about the local DA's office and the Texas Rangers executing a search warrant and the Patton Village Police Department. [read post]
20 Jan 2018, 1:51 am by Orin Kerr
The Facts This case is a civil suit challenging whether there was probable cause to issue a search warrant. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 9:15 am by J. Adam Engel
  In my view, acquisition of this information constitutes a search within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment, and, consequently, the officers were required to either obtain a warrant supported by probable cause or establish the applicability of an exception to the warrant requirement. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 2:29 pm
Rev. 677 (2010) Abstract SSRN: The “Private Search” exception to the Fourth Amendment allows law enforcement officers to re-create, without a warrant, a search conducted by a private individual, provided two conditions are met. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 11:59 am by Kim Zetter
But the amicus brief argues that IP addresses are more akin to cellphone location data, and should thus require a search warrant instead. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 2:42 pm by CJLF Staff
Supreme Court has ruled that police officers may not search a criminal suspect's cell phone during an arrest without a warrant. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 3:00 am by Christopher Tyner
  A few weeks ago, Jeff blogged about the particularity requirement for search warrants – the principle that a warrant must provide a sufficiently particular description of the place to be searched and the things to be seized such that the warrant doesn’t authorize a general rummaging of a person’s belongings. [read post]
1 May 2014, 3:08 pm by Hanni Fakhoury
The Issues Before the Supreme Court After the police arrest someone, they're allowed to search the arrestee's person and the items within their immediate control without a search warrant for two reasons: first to make sure the person is not hiding a weapon that can harm officers, and second, to ensure that any evidence that could be lost or destroyed is secured. [read post]
6 Jun 2009, 12:59 pm
Pena-Rodriguez, 110 F.3d 1120, 1129-30 (5th Cir. 1997)), the court finds that the good faith exception applies to a search with a particularity issue were the warrant covered 436 and 438 but only 438 should have been searched. [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 12:31 pm
“It’s clear that the government has requested at least one search warrant and got an order authorizing a wiretap of one or more phones,” says Ropes & Gray’s Michael McGovern. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 1:38 pm by Orin S. Kerr
Geofence warrants raise some really interesting Fourth Amendment issues, and we're likely to hear more about those issues. [read post]
22 Mar 2022, 2:39 pm by Eugene Volokh
The agents acted with warrants that allowed them to seize phones and computers to search for evidence of trafficking in interstate property [apparently related to an investigation into the alleged theft of Ashley Biden's diary -EV]. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 8:53 am by Lee Davis
Even if e-mails are more recent, the federal government needs a search warrant only for “unopened” e-mail. [read post]
24 Nov 2012, 10:24 am
Even if e-mails are more recent, the federal government needs a search warrant only for "unopened" e-mail. [read post]