Search for: "In Re Sears" Results 461 - 480 of 678
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am by Bexis
We're talking about the Restatement (Third) of Torts, Products Liability §2, to be precise. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 11:14 pm by Transplanted Lawyer
I love eating potatoes and I notice they're popular whenever I serve them. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 3:46 pm by Lawrence Cunningham
And where are the humanities more alive . . . than in seminars in bioethics that expose undergraduates to searing and quite possibly unanswerable questions about the beginning and end of life? [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 12:59 pm by THE KONG FIRM PLLC
 Employees respond in kind by demanding a reciprocal provision, to guard against employers bad-mouthing them to prospective employers that can destroy their chances of getting re-employed or get them fired from a new job. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 6:57 am by Ted Frank
But the shareholders get nothing, so they're worse off because of the litigation. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 5:49 am by Brian Scott
In some cases, statues and monuments are considered public domain because they're a government commissioned display. [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 4:37 pm by nyinjuries
Stores that were involved included Rainbow stores, Target, Walmart, Sears and Walgreens. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 3:39 am by Susan Perera
  A bit of research reveals, Limited Brands (which has cultivated multiple store brands including: Express, The Limited, Victoria’s Secret, Bath & Body Works, Lane Bryant, Lerner New York, and Galyan’s) sold the Structure brand to Sears in 2003 after it re-branded its clothing stores under the Express Men mark. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 9:19 am by Steve Hall
It's a searing must-read following a long trail of ineffective representation and its aftermath. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 8:12 am by Simon Fodden
In a hot pan, sear sea scallops for a minute or two on each side, depending on size. [read post]
24 Jul 2010, 10:49 am by John Culhane
We’re talking about an entity that will live for only a few hours, often, and which isn’t human in the sense that matters to me from the point of view of moral philosophy: as a rights holder. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 4:30 am by Steve McConnell
Sears, Roebuck and Co., 547 F.3d 742 (7th Cir. 2008). [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 6:26 pm by pete.black@gmail.com (Peter Black)
By giving your first preference to a major party, you’re helping lock in more of the same policies. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 8:08 am by Steve Hall
 Atlanta lawyer Bob Edwards, who represented Sears on appeal, said, "We're very, very grateful for the court's decision. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 8:14 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Just because they’re both cosmetics labeled organic doesn’t mean they compete directly. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 6:57 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Sears settlement: Disclosure of internet monitoring, buried deep in licensing agreement, was insufficient given the nature of the intrusion on consumer privacy. [read post]