Search for: "In Re Senior Appeals Examiners" Results 461 - 480 of 618
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2011, 12:06 pm by Jeffrey J. Randa
Once the Evaluation has been completed, both my Ann (my Senior Assistant), and I, will go over it with a fine-tooth comb. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 5:17 am by INFORRM
At this second stage the court will apply the principles set out by Lord Steyn in Re S (A Child) (Identification: Restrictions on Publication) [2005] 1 AC 593. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 12:55 pm by Joel R. Brandes
It concluded that to determine the habitual residence, the court must focus on the child, not the parents, and examine past experience, not future intentions. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 9:38 am by azatty
If re-elected, I would address these issues as follows: Petition the Supreme Court to decrease Bar dues. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 1:54 am by Charon QC
However, on closer examination, the idea of “burglars’ rights” is not a new phenomenon in English law, and nor has it been imposed upon us by Strasbourg. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 7:14 am by Mark Herrmann
If you’re the appellant, find an issue that’s reviewable de novo and press that issue on appeal. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 9:33 am by WSLL
Pojman, Senior Assistant Attorney General. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 1:47 pm
Andy Clemson (Senior Assistant, Cleveland) was closely focused on trade mark matters. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 1:34 pm by Steve Hall
But they say they're doing their best and are trying to take the rejection in stride. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 4:17 am by Mandelman
The COP Report was also fascinating when, on page 5 of the report, it pointed out the following as a way to improve the program’s performance: “Treasury should also carefully examine HAMP? [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
We note that the NGO “Privacy International” has a re-designed website. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:43 am by J. Gordon Hylton
The “no trading with the pennant winner” rule was also submitted to the National League owners, but the senior circuit magnates declined to adopt it. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 3:30 am by Gene Quinn
Supreme Court accepts Microsof v. i4i appeal On November 29, 2010, the United States Supreme Court decided to accept Microsoft’s appeal, which will require the Supreme Court to decide whether to further chip away at the value of patents in general. [read post]
24 Dec 2010, 6:56 am by The Legal Blog
The Bench speaking through Justice Lahoti has examined the various judicial pronouncements on the doctrine and has formulated the various principles  regarding the same. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 6:11 am by The Editors
When Communist Party Chair Hua Guofeng re-established the national university entrance examination in 1977, Xiaobo was admitted to the Chinese department of Jilin University. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 2:52 am by Carolina Bracken
“In essence,” he concludes, “we’re finally giving up”. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 5:08 am by Jonathan Rosenfeld
  Certainly as we need to re-examine the applicable rules and regulations that apply to all elders to ensure their safety is not compromised by corporations seeks to avoid compliance. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 7:31 pm by Transplanted Lawyer
But it isn't going to help your discovery disputes very much and is only of marginal utility in a courtroom setting -- because in a good examination, the examiner is providing the bulk of the information, not the examinee.It is my belief that a layperson will have no idea what the phrase "Senior Partner" means, but the idea that a guy whose name is on the door would be something other than a key decision-maker for the firm is alien. [read post]