Search for: "In re N.C.1" Results 461 - 480 of 538
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Feb 2010, 11:59 pm
The total does not include retirees, such as London corporate partners David Kershaw and Alan Kitchin, and most come on top of the 27 partners who have left Ashurst's limited liability partnership since May 1. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 2:50 am
If you are 10, maybe even 30 from the bottom of the seniority list in a place like Ann Arbor, you're looking. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
  Comment a to Section 500 describes two distinct types of reckless conduct which represent very different mental states:  (1) where the “actor knows, or has reason to know, . [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 9:40 am
The following appear to be the leading recent cases: 1. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
§ 230(c)(1) immunity from libel and similar lawsuits has likewise allowed platforms to amass and deploy financial resources on a scale that few corporations can match. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 9:17 am by Eugene Volokh
App. 1999), and (with a somewhat different approach, and involving the sterilization of a man), In re Sterilization of Moore (N.C. 1975). [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 4:26 am
Taxing the drug $50 an ounce, it said, would generate more than $1 billion annually for a cash-strapped state that closed a $42 billion budget deficit last month. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 9:11 pm by smtaber
— Department of Justice  News Release, November 30, 2009 A federal grand jury in Greensboro, N.C., returned an indictment today charging a poultry processor and a plant manager with multiple violations of the Clean Water Act for illegally discharging wastewater from its Raeford, N.C., based facility, the Justice Department announced. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 5:35 am by Jack Goldsmith
If so, they may publish if they know they're protected by the "actual malice" standard, but refrain from publishing if they are subject to the negligence standard. [read post]
22 Jul 2006, 11:22 am
" The statute also provides that "a civil action for a violation of this section may be brought only if the conduct involves 1 of the factors set forth in clause (i), (ii), (iii), (iv), or (v) of subsection (a)(5)(B). [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 3:51 pm by Lyle Denniston
Blackman, an assistant appellate public defender from Durham, N.C. [read post]