Search for: "In re Application of Johns"
Results 461 - 480
of 6,545
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2016, 3:29 am
And finally, the Board agreed with the Examining Attorney that the stylization of the applied-for mark was not sufficiently distinctive to create a commercial impression beyond the mark's surname significance.The Board concluded that the USPTO had established a prima facie case under Section 2(e)(4) that applicant failed to rebut, and so the Board affirmed the refusal.Read comments and post your comment here.TTABlog comment: Applicant did not pursue a claim of acquired… [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 5:01 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 2:58 am
In re Douglas A. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 2:51 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 3:25 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 3:25 am
In re Ethan A. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 3:34 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 7:12 pm
Neighbors Supeno and Ernst appealed the decision of the Superior Court, Environmental Division upholding the Town of Addison Development Review Board’s (DRB) grant of certificates of occupancy for two detached decks and a conditional use permit for an enclosed deck to applicants Linda J. and John P. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 7:12 pm
Neighbors Supeno and Ernst appealed the decision of the Superior Court, Environmental Division upholding the Town of Addison Development Review Board’s (DRB) grant of certificates of occupancy for two detached decks and a conditional use permit for an enclosed deck to applicants Linda J. and John P. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 4:29 am
And it does not matter whether Applicant was the first and/or only user of the term.The Board therefore affirmed the refusal to register.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 10:55 am
On re-direct, Mr. [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 2:55 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 7:10 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
20 May 2020, 3:51 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
28 Aug 2006, 4:55 am
"Text Copyright John L. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 1:50 am
In re Harte-Hanks, Inc., Serial No. 77017666 (June 30, 2010) [not precedential].As we know, the test for determining genericness involves two questions: what is the genus of the services? [read post]
30 Sep 2021, 3:45 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 3:19 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 3:30 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 3:00 am
In re Nielsen Business Media, Inc., 93 USPQ2d 1545 (TTAB 2010) [precedential].In response to a Section 2(e)(1) mere descriptiveness refusal of its intent-to-use application, Applicant claimed that the mark THE BOLLYWOOD REPORTER had acquired distinctiveness and was therefore registrable under Section 2(f). [read post]
