Search for: "In re Austin B."
Results 461 - 480
of 553
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2010, 12:31 pm
Today he announced the nomination of Judge John B. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am
The California Air Resources Board announced Wednesday that it has penalized Conopco Inc. d/b/a Unilever $1.3 million for illegal consumer sales of AXE Deodorant Bodyspray for Men. [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 11:10 am
Fudging your grades will get you gigs at Skadden Arps and Sidley Austin, but won't get you disbarred. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 11:24 am
"We're back where we were in 2002," said Reed attorney Bryce Benjet. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 8:25 am
(b) The Court has recognized that the First Amendment appliesto corporations, e.g., First Nat. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 7:57 am
Beinecke, Chair, Hughes Hubbard; Heather Bock, Ph.D., Chief Professional Development Officer, Howrey LLP; Francis B. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 3:44 am
CAFC Affirms TTAB Genericness Ruling re "MATTRESS.COM" for -- Guess What? [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 6:14 am
In re The John G. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 2:35 am
Meanwhile, because he's incarcerated he cannot a) pay restitution to victims, b) earn a living or c) pay taxes. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 2:47 am
He was in Austin every week lobbying with terrific success, but his incentive to do so was the fee agreement. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 3:17 am
" Notice of entry of an order only affects the time to appeal and the time to re-argue. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 12:00 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
28 Nov 2009, 8:15 am
Terry Keel of Austin - unanimously voted for state Rep. [read post]
26 Nov 2009, 7:30 am
Despite the disclaimer Walcutt, to his credit, seems to a) answer questions only in his geographical (Texas) and practice (criminal) areas; and b) provide thoughtful, accurate answers. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 3:10 pm
When last confronted with this issue, we relied on In re Clarke’s Will, 198 Md. 266, 81 A.2d 640, Austin W. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 2:03 pm
Id. at 862–63 (citing Jack B. [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 1:29 am
(h/t: austin defender via grits) [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 11:08 am
D/B/A PUMP IT UP! [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 7:05 am
O’Quinn D/B/A O’Quinn & Laminack (“appellees”), for legal malpractice. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 5:51 am
Above the Law posts some analysis of the strategy behind the newly re-filed opposition to the nickname of the Washington Redskins. [read post]
