Search for: "In re Case" Results 461 - 480 of 164,570
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2008, 10:32 am
We're very grateful to our friends over at the wonderful Conflict of Laws blog for drawing attention to the reference in Case C-195/08 PPU Rinau That case carries the suffix "PPU". [read post]
20 Nov 2008, 2:15 pm
In the case In re Loral Space and Communications Inc., Consolidated Litigation, 2008 WL 4293781 (Del. [read post]
20 Dec 2009, 10:01 am by CrimProf BlogEditor
Doug Keller has posted Why the Prior Conviction Sentencing Enhancements in Illegal Re-Entry Cases are Unjust and Unjustified (and Unreasonable Too) on SSRN. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 4:00 am by Ted Folkman
In the case of the day, In re Application of High Point SARL (N.D. [read post]
5 May 2011, 5:00 am by Craig Robins
  Judge Grossman permitted the debtor to re-open the case to enter into a lease assumption agreement. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 2:03 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
As the writer of the amicus brief on behalf of the Pennsylvania Defense Institute in favor of the defense position, I just received notification from the Pennsylvania Superior Court that the Re-Argument en banc in the case of Barrick v. [read post]
10 Feb 2022, 8:49 am by Tania Rivas
Data also revealed that seat belts saved an estimated 14,955 […] The post Can Not Wearing a Seat Belt Hurt Your Case if You’re Injured in a Florida Car Accident? [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 8:55 am by Lawrence Solum
Re (University of Virginia School of Law) has posted Permissive Interpretation on SSRN. [read post]
22 May 2008, 4:38 am
” WLR Daily, 21st May 2008 Source: www.lawreports.co.uk Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR   Daily summary is removed. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 7:04 am by Daniel E. Cummins
BREAKING NEWS: The Pennsylvania Superior Court has issued an Order granting re-argument en banc in the case of Barrick v. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 10:13 am by Kate Fort
This case disagrees with the really not great In re Austin J. case and is from the same appellate district. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 5:27 am by Barry Aronin
 In the video below, Barry highlights 4 questions to expect when you’re filing a case. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 6:11 am
The CAFC noted that on 12(b)(6) motions, the law of the regional circuit is applied, citing Phonometrics, 203 F.3d 790.The In re Garner case involved an issue of priority. [read post]