Search for: "In re I.S." Results 461 - 480 of 13,468
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Aug 2022, 2:13 pm
In re Youman, 679 F.3d at 1343–45 (citing In re Mostafazadeh, 643 F.3d at 1360 (“The recapture rule is triggered only where the reissue claims are broader than the patented claims because the surrendered subject matter has been reclaimed in whole or substantial part (i.e., an added limitation has been eliminated or revised). [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 7:06 pm by John Gregory
The ULCC published a study of them back in 1998 – I doubt they’re more sound now than they were then. [read post]
26 May 2011, 7:50 am by The Docket Navigator
" In re: Cyclobenzaprine Hydrochloride Extended-Release Capsule Patent Litigation, 1-09-md-02118 (DED May 24, 2011, Order) (Robinson, J.) [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 2:47 pm by Ernie Svenson
The 3 R’s of Referral Marketing are: Remind people that you exist, what you do exactly, and that you care about helping people (i.e. that you’re empathetic) Regularly remind them (i.e. at least once per month, NOT just around New Years when everyone is sending holiday cards etc.) [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 11:20 am
Since our tax system relies on voluntary reporting of income (i.e. you volunteer your tax information to the IRS and tell them how much you owe), the IRS uses the fear of audits to scare people into being honest. [read post]
These examples include encrypting the message (prior to hashing), encrypting the hash value, or adding “salt” or “noise” (i.e., a random number) to the original message. [read post]
29 Dec 2013, 8:29 am by Kate Fort
In this contested deprived child proceeding subject to ICWA, even if State had provided Father access to the specific services and programs after the show cause hearing and he had successfully commenced those programs, foster care placement could not have been avoided in light of the clear and convincing evidence supporting the juvenile court’s ¶ 1912(e)’s finding, i.e. at this stage of the proceeding Father’s continued custody was likely to result in serious… [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 3:26 pm by Howard Knopf
Gannon, who was called to the bar in 2009, is an associate at McCarthy, Tétrault, working under Barry Sookman, a well known lawyer/lobbyist for some very politically savvy clients, i.e. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 11:52 am by Howard Knopf
  In a nutshell, AC denies that it ever issued transactional licenses before that would fall within the scope of  the post secondary licenses (i.e. one chapter, 10% of a work, etc.). [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 5:05 am by John White
 The folks doing the filing and protecting weren’t thinking about what the documents were doing, they’re too close to it for it to be revealed. [read post]
6 May 2015, 8:54 am
Exposing professionalism helps to re-orient knowledge and power in culture production, and is therefore key to a robust semiotic democracy.Download the article from SSRN at the link.Cross posted at Media Law Prof Blog here. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 11:37 am
 Somewhat funny that we're directed to a for-profit site instead. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 1:48 pm
Today's DJ features Jimmy Azadian and Kyser Blakely in Supreme Court Round-up about the final decisions of OT2015, i.e., Whole Woman's Health, Fisher, Taylor, etc.Also on the front page is a big photo of 4/1's Justice Aaron re: 4th District Panel Reverses Two Murder Convictions.Note also that PJ Gilbert will be this week's guest on the Champions of Justice radio show (e.g., KABC 790, Sat. at 11 a.m. and Sun. at 10 p.m.) [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 4:16 pm
Today's published opinion in In re Westwood Plaza North, is a per curiam opinion from this month's motions panel, holding that the FRAP 38 motion for sanctions (for pursuing a frivolous appeal) was timely because it was filed within the time for seeking fees (under 9th Circuit rule 39-1.6(a)), i.e., 14 days after the time for a rehearing petition or after the court's disposition of a rehearing petition. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 7:40 am by admin
Under a consent agreement (i.e., settlement), Bauer has also agreed to remove or modify the challenged claims and adopt an enhanced corporate compliance program. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 9:41 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
” In re Oetiker, 977 F.2d 1443, 1445 (Fed.Cir. 1992).Here:In this case, we agree with Appellant that the preponderance of theevidence of record fails to establish that IFN-α-induced psychosis wassufficiently linked to glucocorticoid regulatory dysfunction (i.e., increasedlevels of cortisol) such that a person of ordinary skill in the art would havebeen motivated to treat IFN-α-induced psychosis with glucocorticoidreceptor antagonists according to the teachings of… [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 4:15 am by Clint Wilkins
§ 325(d), i.e., if “the same or substantially the same prior art or arguments previously were presented to the Office. [read post]