Search for: "In re I.S."
Results 461 - 480
of 13,254
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2016, 7:06 pm
The ULCC published a study of them back in 1998 – I doubt they’re more sound now than they were then. [read post]
26 May 2011, 7:50 am
" In re: Cyclobenzaprine Hydrochloride Extended-Release Capsule Patent Litigation, 1-09-md-02118 (DED May 24, 2011, Order) (Robinson, J.) [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 6:16 am
These examples include encrypting the message (prior to hashing), encrypting the hash value, or adding “salt” or “noise” (i.e., a random number) to the original message. [read post]
29 Dec 2013, 8:29 am
In this contested deprived child proceeding subject to ICWA, even if State had provided Father access to the specific services and programs after the show cause hearing and he had successfully commenced those programs, foster care placement could not have been avoided in light of the clear and convincing evidence supporting the juvenile court’s ¶ 1912(e)’s finding, i.e. at this stage of the proceeding Father’s continued custody was likely to result in serious… [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 3:26 pm
Gannon, who was called to the bar in 2009, is an associate at McCarthy, Tétrault, working under Barry Sookman, a well known lawyer/lobbyist for some very politically savvy clients, i.e. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 11:52 am
In a nutshell, AC denies that it ever issued transactional licenses before that would fall within the scope of the post secondary licenses (i.e. one chapter, 10% of a work, etc.). [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 2:11 pm
So you're still guilty. [read post]
30 Sep 2006, 9:21 am
A company in Montreal has created an online world that attempts to re-create the real world; subscribers then purchase the online rights to these copies. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 8:10 am
"So if you've got a case with facts like that, you're in trouble. [read post]
8 Jun 2014, 1:15 pm
Current NRA and NSSF safety philosophies are predicated toward range self-containment of shot rounds, i.e., “if it’s shot here, keep it here. [read post]
4 Sep 2024, 1:28 pm
by Dennis Crouch In patent litigation, we continue to see enhanced focus on qualifying (i.e., disqualifying) expert witnesses. [read post]
6 May 2015, 8:54 am
Exposing professionalism helps to re-orient knowledge and power in culture production, and is therefore key to a robust semiotic democracy.Download the article from SSRN at the link.Cross posted at Media Law Prof Blog here. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 11:37 am
Somewhat funny that we're directed to a for-profit site instead. [read post]
14 Jul 2022, 5:02 pm
I see the argument.But there are still two owners listed on the document, Sotheby's (allegedly) released the diamonds to one of the two listed owners, and Section 1828 of the Civil Code says you're allowed to do that without any liability attaching. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 5:05 am
The folks doing the filing and protecting weren’t thinking about what the documents were doing, they’re too close to it for it to be revealed. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 4:01 am
In re Medtech Products Inc., Serial No. 86836486 (July 24, 2017) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge David Mermelstein). [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 1:48 pm
Today's DJ features Jimmy Azadian and Kyser Blakely in Supreme Court Round-up about the final decisions of OT2015, i.e., Whole Woman's Health, Fisher, Taylor, etc.Also on the front page is a big photo of 4/1's Justice Aaron re: 4th District Panel Reverses Two Murder Convictions.Note also that PJ Gilbert will be this week's guest on the Champions of Justice radio show (e.g., KABC 790, Sat. at 11 a.m. and Sun. at 10 p.m.) [read post]
New York Federal Court Creates Miscellaneous Civil Case for Administration of Hurricane Sandy Claims
26 Jan 2014, 6:24 am
The Miscellaneous Civil Case is titled: “In Re Hurricane Sandy Cases” and the EDNY Case Number is 14 MC 41. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 7:40 am
Under a consent agreement (i.e., settlement), Bauer has also agreed to remove or modify the challenged claims and adopt an enhanced corporate compliance program. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 12:59 pm
Nevertheless, the oral arguments suggest there will be a split among the justices, perhaps along political lines (i.e., liberal wing vs. conservative wing). [read post]
