Search for: "In re Juvenile -A & a." Results 461 - 480 of 3,851
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Aug 2018, 6:37 am by MBettman
In re C.S., 2007-Ohio-4919 (Juvenile courts are premised on different goals than criminal courts, and instead focus on the state’s role to protect wayward children, save them from criminal prosecution, and rehabilitate them.) [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 2:52 pm
If it doesn't feel like it, or doesn't feel they're significant, it can just ignore 'em. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 10:02 am by Kent Scheidegger
See In re Det. of Reyes, 184 Wn.2d 340,347,358 P.3d 394 (2015). [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 7:24 pm
“You’re out of court” if Roper does not apply, Justice Scalia said. [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 7:45 am
OTOH, they're struggling with unfunded mandates now from youth sent home early and the refusal of misdemeanants into TYC, so they too might be at a point where they're willing to change how they do business. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 9:04 pm
When you hire a Southern California Criminal Defense attorney with extensive juvenile criminal defense experience, you're minor son or daughter will be protected by the lawyer, by carefully scrutinizing the strengths and weaknesses of the prosecutor's case, and will seek both charge and sentence reductions, and maybe even a complete dismissal in an appropriate case. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 9:04 pm
When you hire a Southern California Criminal Defense attorney with extensive juvenile criminal defense experience, you're minor son or daughter will be protected by the lawyer, by carefully scrutinizing the strengths and weaknesses of the prosecutor's case, and will seek both charge and sentence reductions, and maybe even a complete dismissal in an appropriate case. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 7:03 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Consider Changes to Juvenile Justice Laws," USA Today, March 1, 2014 Juvenile Age of Jurisdiction and Transfer to Adult Court Laws (map), National Conference of State Legislatures, Jan. 10, 2014 Mandatory Sentencing 17 year-olds in Adult Court - Is There a Better Alternative for Wisconsin's Youth and Taxpayers? [read post]
17 May 2010, 10:47 am by Lyle Denniston
  But the Court did not rule that any of those 129 must now be released, or even that any of them must be re-sentenced. [read post]
24 May 2022, 2:23 pm by Anthony A. Fatemi, LLC
” The detectives re-explained the nature of Miranda rights, then resumed attempting to get the teen’s signature on the piece of paper. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 12:19 pm
Category: Recent Decisions;Juvenile Law Opinions Body: AC34143 - In re Shaun S. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 4:29 pm
Kids often think they’re invincible and fail to look past the moment. [read post]
9 Aug 2007, 12:39 am
The court also cited In re Winship, 397 U.S. 358, 368 (1970), in observing that the safeguards that are required for juvenile offenses-the right to notice, the right to counsel, the right to confront and cross-examine witnesses, the privilege against self-incrimination, and proof of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt-"are more than sufficient to ensure the reliability that Apprendi requires. [read post]
3 May 2012, 8:50 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Juvenile Law Opinions Body: AC33575 - In re Zowie N. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 7:09 am by Jamison Koehler
  It has taken me a while to re-familiarize myself with the terminology used in juvenile court; for example, how it is an “initial hearing” and not an arraignment, a “respondent” and not a defendant, and so on. [read post]