Search for: "In re Marks" Results 461 - 480 of 29,925
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2020, 2:04 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
” VFC registered the UP mark and the word mark “UP ULTRA PREMIUM EXTRA VIRGIN OLIVE OIL CERTIFIED LAB TESTED SENSORY EVALUATED HIGHEST STANDARD” (not as certification marks). [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 11:32 am by Shawn Garrison
” The post Old Navy Father’s Day Campaign Misses Mark appeared first on Dads Divorce. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 3:20 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Pactiv’s patent claims are currently stayed pending re-examination before the PTO. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 9:18 pm
Re-reading Sunday's NYT business article, "To ewanted=print&oref=slogin&ref=business&adxnnlx=1214251427-KB/tRin/Egc0IYkR/Zzx1Q">the Trenches -- The Tort War is Raging On", we finally get to the conclusion, which offers something to look forward to:PLAINTIFF-SIDE lawyers are innovating. [read post]
23 Jun 2024, 2:02 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
“What we’re truly doing is looking at the root of all identity-based hate,” she said. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 5:29 am by Cheryl Beise
The marks were confusingly similar and the goods were so highly related as to be expected to emanate from a single source (In Re: Halo Leather Ltd., June 13, 2018, per curiam). [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 3:42 am
Chien, 120 USPQ2d 1710, 1716 (TTAB 2016); In re Eagle Crest Inc., 96 USPQ2d 1227, 1229 (TTAB 2010); In re Volvo Cars of N. [read post]
24 Nov 2007, 4:02 pm
So this site was hopping a couple of years back, on its way to making its marky-mark on the dozens of people in the world who care deeply about moot court, and then I took a summer off, and summer stretched to fall, and things got busy, and I learned that keeping track of what goes down in the moot court world takes time, time that I decided was better spent doing other things, and so Mootness settled into an Abe Vigoda-esque state of limbo, not exactly dead, really, seeing as it would… [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 4:30 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Meteorologically it tells me that we’re going to enjoy an ideal day for training tomorrow. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 4:55 pm by Justin E. Gray
In response to a petition for writ of mandamus in the Federal Circuit in In re BP Lubricants USA Inc., regarding the issue of whether the pleading requirements of Rule 9(b) apply to false marking cases, the United States has submitted an amicus curiae brief that states: The position of the United States is that, consistent with other cases "sounding in fraud," False Marking cases should be subject to the pleading requirements of Rule 9(b). [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 4:23 am by John L. Welch
In re Supreme Steel Framing System Association, Inc., Serial No. 77859631 (December 28, 2012) [precedential]. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 3:22 am
 Here, as the current game of European trade mark reform approaches the endgame, it seems that a simple, single solution that will apply equally to Community trade marks and national marks may still be allowed to evade our grip -- and this will certainly happen if we ignore it. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 2:58 pm
McDonough, 464 F.3d 1256 (11th Cir. 2006) ......................................................3, 10-12 In re Greenberg, 2006 WL 1594202 (11th Cir. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 4:52 pm
In re The Ride, LLC, Serial No. 86845550 (February 3, 2020) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Peter W. [read post]
25 May 2016, 4:05 am
In re Minegar, Serial No. 86179013 (May 23, 2016) [not precedential].Because the services overlap, the Board must presume, "at least with respect to the overlapping services, that the channels of trade and classes of purchasers are the same. [read post]