Search for: "In re Oliver"
Results 461 - 480
of 1,444
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Aug 2007, 9:33 pm
For the next 5 days, and over Labor Day, I'll go to Big Sur and then Cannery Row to re-group, sharpen tools, re-read the rules, meet with some serious idea mongers and try out new ideas of my own. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 7:26 am
A Modest Appeal for Decent Respect, 22 Federal Sentencing Reporter 72 (2010) (with Jessica Olive). [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 8:27 am
Observe the camouflage: We’re not against shelters, we’re against big shelters that will disrupt the environment. [read post]
9 May 2012, 9:36 pm
We’re still shocked these laws still exist. [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 5:32 am
Holden "NantucketBoy" Oliver* isn't as busy, and is nicely holding down the blog fort. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 9:59 pm
Oliver-D. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 8:59 pm
Oliver-D. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 6:32 pm
We're not that infallible. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 3:41 am
You’re not stopping me. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 2:12 pm
That's time and effort (and money) that can't be spent on what you're ordinarily doing, and it creates standing.So the principle that Judge McKeown espouses seems just wrong as a categorical matter. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 11:29 am
But, we’re heartened that our case makes some good new law for future cases. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 7:30 am
But Dirk, like Oliver, does miss perhaps the most important point. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 8:03 am
As John Oliver recently noted, nowhere is that more true than in jails and prisons. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 11:02 am
You’re sick of reading. [read post]
26 May 2010, 2:59 am
"This is what we're hired to do, to get out there and teach. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 3:29 am
I’m speaking of Jason Aldean and Oliver Anthony. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 12:20 pm
In the context of examining whether such a process is excluded from patentability as being "essentially biological" within the meaning of Article 53(b) EPC, it is not relevant whether a step of a technical nature is a new or known measure, whether it is trivial or a fundamental alteration of a known process, whether it does or could occur in nature or whether the essence of the invention lies in it.There is, of course, much reasoning behind the answers, some of which has already been… [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 4:00 am
Oliver Wendell Holmes was on the Massachusetts bench, and New York had Cardozo. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 4:00 am
When you remember that Ordinary People beat out Raging Bull for Best Picture, that Oliver! [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 5:01 am
(TTABlogged here).In re Cheezwhse.com, Inc., Serial Nos. 78711311 and 78730624 (October 29, 2007) [not precedential]. [read post]
