Search for: "In re R. S. (1985)" Results 461 - 480 of 1,236
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Feb 2015, 12:21 pm
The cases in the study all were closed between 1985 and 2009, and the researchers limited their review to the ones involving internal medicine physicians; they numbered 33,747. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 10:47 am by Barry Sookman
The re-hearing took place on December 15, 2014 (oral argument available here) and the decision of the full court is still outstanding. [read post]
28 Dec 2014, 4:12 pm by Giles Peaker
The tenancy was a secure tenancy from 1985.Mr and Mrs Laval raised 6 children in the property, but after 1981 Mr Lawal spent much of his tie in Nigeria. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
His most recent publication is The Treason Trial of Aaron Burr: Law, Politics, and the Character Wars of the New Nation (2012).R. [read post]
14 Dec 2014, 10:24 am by SJM
The tenancy pre-dated the changes to the 1985 Housing Act brought in by the Localism Act 2011 on 1/4/2012, which meant that because Ms T and Mr D were an unmarried couple, s.87(b) applied to Ms T's application. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 12:38 pm by Ralph L. Jacobson
Fresno Community Hospital (1985) 174 Cal.App.3d 39, that had permitted such a recovery. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 6:06 am by Giles Peaker
It was probably the case that the FTT had not done this, but in any event the FTT's conclusions (as summarised above) were wrong in law. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 8:07 am by Juan C. Antúnez
November 07, 2013) If you’re a trusts and estates lawyer, a larger and larger share of your practice is going to have little — if anything — to do with our probate code. [read post]
22 Nov 2014, 1:51 pm
Citing the Supreme Court’s 1985 precedent of Heckler v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
Parke, Davis & Co., 256 F.3d 1013, 1021 (10th Cir. 2001) (wrong to “construe [a treater’s] ‘heeding’ an adequate warning to mean [s/he] would have given the warning”) (applying Oklahoma law); In re Diet Drug Litigation, 895 A.2d 480, 490-91 (N.J. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 11:24 pm by J
The real remedy for leaseholders was always s.19, Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, i.e. the requirement that service charges be reasonably incurred and represent reasonable value for money. [read post]