Search for: "In re S.E."
Results 461 - 480
of 620
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Nov 2010, 12:19 pm
Meter, 681 S.E.2d 382 (N.C. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 12:47 pm
Meter, 681 S.E.2d 382 (N.C. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 8:00 am
., 249 S.C. 652, 155 S.E.2d 917 (Ct. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 1:48 pm
The Virginia Court of Appeals ruled that wife’s claims were barred by res judicata. [read post]
2 Oct 2010, 11:14 am
Not in In re Marcel Minor, CL10-744, where the Richmond City Circuit Court judge held that the mother filing for the support change had not meet her burden of proof in establishing a material change in circumstances. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 2:29 pm
Rep. 2 (May 2008) (asserting that $4.85 billion Vioxx settlement was for “nuisance” value"); In re Agent Orange Products Liability Litigation, 818 F.2d 145, 171 (2d Cir. 1987) (finding “good reason to view” $180 million Agent Orange settlement as for “nuisance value”). [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 1:38 pm
See also, In re: Ashely Albright, 2003 Bankr.Lexis 291 Bank. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 5:03 am
., 306 S.C. 145, 410 S.E.2d 564, 567 (1991). [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 4:30 am
., No. 26786, --- S.E.2d ---, 2010 WL 916109 (S.C. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 12:03 pm
Widman, 348 S.C. 97, 557 S.E.2d 693 (2001). [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
We're talking about the Restatement (Third) of Torts, Products Liability §2, to be precise. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 12:02 pm
Commonwealth, __ S.E.2d __, 2010 WL 3463131 (Virginia Court of Appeals 2010), a Virginia court held that monitoring a GPS device isn’t a search under the 4th Amendment or the Virginia Constitution’s version of the 4th Amendment (and that installing the device isn’t a seizure under either provision). [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 9:00 pm
App. 782, 792, 595 S.E.2d 30, 35 (2004) (finding appellant’s refusal to remove his hand from his pocket is a factor to be considered in finding reasonable suspicion). [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 2:41 pm
In the last month, we’ve seen two more appellate decisions definitively rejecting the idea of some sort of separate cause of action – apart from warning or design defect – for “failure to test,” whatever that might be. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 4:41 am
Not in the case of In re Wilkinson, 100 B.R. 315 (Bankr.W.D.Va. 1989) http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case? [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 12:00 am
" Our North Carolina Supreme Court, in In re K.J.L., 363 N.C. 343, 348, 677 S.E.2d 835, 838 (2009), reversed the majority decision of this Court, on the basis of Judge Robert C. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 8:28 am
by Paul Bland, Claire Prestel, and Melanie Hirsch The consumer and civil rights communities are closely watching AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 9:02 am
., In re K.W., 666 S.E.2d 490, 494 (2008) (although victim admitted that the proffered MySpace page was hers, she claimed that her friend posted the answers to the survey questions that defendant sought to introduce as impeachment evidence with respect to her claims of rape). [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 10:24 am
., __ S.E.2d __, 2010 WL 2403438 (N.C. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 5:00 am
June 15, 2010).We’re particularly pleased with Gibson because it dispatched one of our longest-standing bête noirs – market share liability. [read post]
