Search for: "In re SO" Results 461 - 480 of 197,701
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2011, 5:51 am by Glenn Reynolds
WELL, WE’RE HALFWAY THERE: So now that New York will have happily-maried gay couples, can we get started on letting them have the closets full of assault rifles? [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 4:04 am
In re Jay Edwin Gibson (Per Curiam) - Gibson filed a writ of habeas corpus, but the trial court didn't timely designate the contested issues. [read post]
The post Strategies for Re-Engaging Workers appeared first on HR Daily Advisor. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 5:30 pm by Blonde Justice
But, now, I kind of see where they're coming from me. [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 5:00 am by Ernie Svenson
So if you’re having a bad experience with them, please realize that you’re not alone. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 6:00 am by Glenn Reynolds
I wonder if they’re marking these things down so aggressively because of competition from GPS-equipped smartphones? [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 3:46 am by traceydennis
In re Perrins, deceased; Perrins v Holland and others [2010] EWCA Civ 840; [2010] WLR (D) 196  ”In a case where a testator had testamentary capacity when he gave instructions for his will, the will as drafted embodied those instructions and when the testator executed his will a year later his testamentary wishes remained unchanged although he was no longer of full testamentary capacity, the principle in Parker v Felgate (1883) LR 8 PD 171, namely that it was not necessary to… [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 2:09 am by sally
In re Perrins, deceased; Perrins v Holland and others [2010] EWCA Civ 840; [2010] WLR (D) 196 “In a case where a testator had testamentary capacity when he gave instructions for his will, the will as drafted embodied those instructions and when the testator executed his will a year later his testamentary wishes remained unchanged although he was no longer of full testamentary capacity, the principle in Parker v Felgate (1883) LR 8 PD 171, namely that it was not necessary to prove… [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 3:57 pm
  Several weeks later, the defendant apparently decided it had a Rembrandt in the attic, so it dusted off the court's venue order and shipped it off to Washington with a cite to In re TS Tech. [read post]
5 Feb 2022, 3:58 am
 Only 1.5% of skiers are black, so they're not the reason why the resorts are crowded, but according to Anthony Kwame Harrison, a professor of sociology and Africana studies at Virginia Tech, "if longtime skiers become frustrated because they are seeing ski areas being crowded, when you look at that crowd, who do you immediately identify as being most out of place? [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 5:00 pm
Last night, in the debate, Barak Obama made a point of emphasizing the $400,000 spent by AIG executives in lavish entertaining in the aftermath of Treasury's decision to provide an $85 billion loan. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 3:40 pm
We're right behind Delaware and just ahead of Tennessee. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 6:43 am by MOTP
Tenants in commercial lease dispute asserted the same counterclaims in court that they had previously dropped in arbitration, and did so when Lessors sought confirmation of the arbitration award for past-due rent. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 9:00 am
The California Supreme Court will hear arguments Tuesday morning in the In re Tobacco II Cases, S147345 (George, C.J., not participating; Moore, J., assigned justice pro tempore) #06-120   In re Tobacco II Cases, S147345. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 2:00 pm
If for some crazy reason you wanted to get re-married or for other personal/financial reasons, you would not be able to do so. [read post]