Search for: "Indemnity Insurance Corporation" Results 461 - 480 of 645
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Aug 2011, 9:56 am
Insurance against the loss of property is a contract of personal indemnity. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 6:00 pm by Rebecca Shafer, J.D.
 Sole providers, partners, corporate officers, and the manager of a limited liability company may elect to exclude themselves from the workers compensation insurance coverage requirements. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 2:50 am
  The Complaint, which was filed by Zurich American Insurance Company and Zurich Insurance Company Ltd. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 2:02 pm by Blog Editorial
AXA General Insurance Limited and others v The Lord Advocate and others (Scotland), heard 13 -15 June 2011. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 7:00 am by Jeffrey Krivis
When dealing with non-governmental cases, such as corporate decision makers or out-of-state insurance offices, having someone available by phone after hours is not the best option, but it is sometimes the only option to get the wheels of settlement spinning. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 12:06 pm by Michael Thomas
  Poole sought a declaration that he was entitled to a defence and indemnity under the firm's insurance policy for an action brought by Danicek. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 12:06 pm by Shaun McParland Baldwin
  Kaiser looked to ISCOP, its excess insurer above the 1974 Truck policy, to respond to the indemnity payments in excess of $500,000. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 12:06 pm by Ryan Irving
  Poole sought a declaration that he was entitled to a defence and indemnity under the firm's insurance policy for an action brought by Danicek. [read post]
13 May 2011, 10:02 am by Vivian Persand
(formerly known as Commercial Underwriters Insurance Company (CUIC)), insured Galaxy Contracting Corporation (Galaxy) under a commercial general liability (CGL) policy with a limit of $1,000,000. [read post]
4 May 2011, 10:00 pm by Stu Ellis
  However USDA’s factsheet on SURE says the requirement is that a farm is already covered by crop insurance, “To be eligible for SURE, a producer must have obtained a policy or plan of insurance for all crops through the Federal Crop Insurance Corporation and obtained Noninsured Crop Disaster Assistance Program (NAP) coverage, if available, from the Farm Service Agency. [read post]
4 May 2011, 10:00 pm by Stu Ellis
  However USDA’s factsheet on SURE says the requirement is that a farm is already covered by crop insurance, “To be eligible for SURE, a producer must have obtained a policy or plan of insurance for all crops through the Federal Crop Insurance Corporation and obtained Noninsured Crop Disaster Assistance Program (NAP) coverage, if available, from the Farm Service Agency. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 1:16 pm by Bexis
The Third Circuit has had plenty to say about expansive predictions of state tort law under the Erie, and it sure hasn’t said anything like that.Instead, it’s held quite the opposite:Travelers Indemnity Co. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 5:16 pm by Robert Elliott, J.D.
      your business organization documents (corporation, partnership, limited liability company, sole proprietor , etc.) [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 7:32 am by Robert Elliott, J.D.
      Joining a group self-insurance association licensed by the Virginia State Corporation Commission. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 1:36 am by Kevin LaCroix
In another, the insured argued that the policy provided coverage for investigations of the corporation, although the policy limited such coverage to individuals. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 2:20 pm by Law Lady
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, A FOREIGN PROFIT CORPORATION, Appellee. 3rd District.Insurance -- Management liability -- Duty to defend and indemnify -- Where policy contained intellectual property rights exclusion which provided that insurer would not be liable for loss in connection with a claim in any way involving any actual or alleged intellectual property rights, trial court properly entered judgment on the pleadings in favor of insurer in… [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 7:16 am by emagraken
 The new regulation changed the definition of an ‘insured claim‘ that ICBC could deduct as follows: 106 (1)  In this section, “insured claim” means any benefit, compensation similar to benefits, right to indemnity or claim to indemnity accruing to a person entitled to benefits, compensation or indemnity or to the personal representative or guardian of the person, and includes a benefit, compensation, right or… [read post]