Search for: "J Doe"
Results 461 - 480
of 28,593
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Mar 2023, 6:07 am
While ComplexDiscovery regularly highlights this information, it does not assume any responsibility for content assertions. [read post]
30 Mar 2024, 5:14 am
Beau J. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 11:33 am
On February 10, 2010, the National Center for Policy Analysis published The Politics of Estate Tax Reform, by Edward J. [read post]
21 May 2012, 5:01 pm
This decision – the knowledge of which I owe to a kind reader of this blog – deals with an appeal against a refusal of a request by the Receiving Section (RS).The application under consideration was filed on August 13, 2009 and claimed the priority of a U.S. application that had been filed on August 14, 2008 (hereinafter “priority application”). [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 6:13 am
Kramer, Audra J. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 5:00 am
Aug. 25, 2015) (Guzman, J.). [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 10:10 am
J. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 4:01 pm
In this regard the Board points out that this wording of R 36(1) EPC is identical to the wording of the former R 25(1) EPC 1973 and, therefore, the corresponding case law can be taken into account.[6] The present Board agrees with the statement of the Legal Board of Appeal in decision J 18/04 that the term “pending earlier European patent application” in R 25 EPC 1973 did not establish a time limit having a point in time at which the pending status of an application begins and… [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 4:00 am
Oct. 7, 2021) (Guzman, J.). [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 4:45 pm
"That's basically what the Ninth Circuit panel does here. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 5:00 am
G-J. [read post]
19 May 2021, 5:00 am
April 13, 2021) (Matey, J., Shwartz, J., Porter, J.) [read post]
13 Jun 2021, 5:19 pm
April 13, 2021) (Matey, J., Shwartz, J., Porter, J.) [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 3:11 am
J.). [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:01 pm
., J 22/86 [2]; T 162/97 [1.1.2]).Exceptionally, it has been acknowledged that “the requirement for admissibility [laid down in A 108, third sentence, EPC 1973] may be regarded as satisfied if it is immediately apparent upon reading the decision under appeal and the written statement [of grounds] that the decision should be set aside” (see J 22/86 [headnote I]).The reasons given in the decision impugned[2.2] In order to determine whether it is possible for the board to… [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 4:01 pm
This is in line with decisions T 842/90 and J 20/00 where it was considered possible that the payment of an additional fee amounting to [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 7:32 am
J. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 6:31 am
., 1-11-cv-00458 (OHND February 3, 2016, Order) (Gaughan, J.) [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 10:04 am
Escort, Inc., et. al., 1-12-cv-00066 (IDD August 5, 2013, Order) (Winmill, J.). [read post]
